Cross-Sectoral Zoonotic Disease Surveillance in Western Kenya: Identifying Drivers and Barriers Within a Resource Constrained Setting

Abstract

Background: Collaboration between the human and animal health sectors, including the sharing of disease surveillance data, has the potential to improve public health outcomes through the rapid detection of zoonotic disease events prior to widespread transmission in humans. Kenya has been at the forefront of embracing a collaborative approach in Africa with the inception of the Zoonotic Disease Unit in 2011. Joint outbreak responses have been coordinated at the national level, yet little is currently documented on cross-sectoral collaboration at the sub-national level.Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted with 28 disease surveillance officers from the human and animal health sectors in three counties in western Kenya. An inductive process of thematic analysis was used to identify themes relating to barriers and drivers for cross-sectoral collaboration.Results: The study identified four interlinking themes related to drivers and barriers for cross-sectoral collaboration. To drive collaboration at the sub-national level there needs to be a clear identification of “common objectives,” as currently exemplified by the response to suspected rabies and anthrax cases and routine meat hygiene activities. The action of collaboration, be it integrated responses to outbreaks or communication and data sharing, require “operational structures” to facilitate them, including the formalisation of reporting lines, supporting legislation and the physical infrastructure, from lab equipment to mobile phones, to facilitate the activities. These structures in turn require “appropriate resources” to support them, which will be allocated based on the “political will” of those who control the resources.Conclusions: Ongoing collaborations between human and animal disease surveillance officers at the sub-national level were identified, driven by common objectives such as routine meat hygiene and response to suspected rabies and anthrax cases. In these areas a suitable operational structure is present, including a supportive legislative framework and clearly designated roles for officers within both sectors. There was support from disease surveillance officers to increase their collaboration, communication and data sharing across sectors, yet this is currently hindered by the lack of these formal operational structures and poor allocation of resources to disease surveillance. It was acknowledged that improving this resource allocation will require political will at the sub-national, national and international levels.

Rapid response screening for emerging zoonotic pathogens, barriers and opportunities: A study for enhanced preparedness of the Netherlands

“…Conflicts between these laws are thus very context and case dependent. Although legislation might differ between countries, similar complexity due to the involvement of multiple laws is observed, including county-specific legislation [ 42 ].…”

Knowledge of and Practices Around Zoonotic Diseases Amongst Actors in the Livestock Trade in the Lake Victoria Crescent Ecosystem in East Africa

“…The study was conducted in Busia County, Western Kenya (Figure 1.1). Busia County is located in the western part of Kenya and broadly represents the Lake Victoria Crescent Ecosystem (19), where several zoonotic infections are co-endemic (20). It borders Uganda with two border crossing points at Busia and Malaba towns.…”

“…where several zoonotic infections are co-endemic (20). It borders Uganda with two border crossing points at Busia and Malaba towns.…”

Foodborne zoonoses control in low- and middle-income countries: Identifying aspects of interventions relevant to traditional markets which act as hurdles when mitigating disease transmission

“…For food-safety governance, collaboration and coordination mechanisms are required between the health, veterinary, and environmental sectors including formal data-sharing agreements, mechanisms for intersectoral communication which escape the highly hierarchical protocols often existing within government institutions, and for intervention implementation inter-sectoral budgetary sharing agreements may be required. Such factors were recognized by health and veterinary surveillance officers in Western Kenya as being key enablers for integrated surveillance and response to zoonoses; including foodborne zoonoses (Thomas et al, 2021). Recent declarations, including from the G7 and the G20, regarding the need for a One Health approach specifically targeting pandemic prevention & preparedness, should provide a platform under which global One Health governance will be strengthened (G20 High Level Independent Panel, 2021; G7, 2021).…”