1973
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1973.01620190009002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Sensitivity and Aminoglycoside Antibiotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could result in false-positive reactions (Raab, 1968). This suggestion has not been confirmed clinically (Schorr, Wenzel & Hegedus, 1973).…”
Section: Clinical Features and Diagnosis Of Skin Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This could result in false-positive reactions (Raab, 1968). This suggestion has not been confirmed clinically (Schorr, Wenzel & Hegedus, 1973).…”
Section: Clinical Features and Diagnosis Of Skin Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In patients sensitized to neomycin, the percentage of cross-reactions to other aminoglycoside antibiotics is high: to paromomycin and butirosin 106 approximately 90%, to framycetin 70%, to ribostamycin 70%, 107 to tobramycin and kanamycin 60%, to gentamicin 50%, to amikacin 30%, 108 and to sisomicin 109 20% 2 . However, streptomycin cross-reacts (or coreacts more likely) in only approximately 4% of the patients 2,107,109 .…”
Section: Cross-reactions and Coreactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be reflected by a higher number of positive neomycin tests with ointments compared to creams (41). Schorr et al (11) have found stronger test responses with concentrations below 30% in petrolatum, and consider the 30% level in petrolatum to form a semisolid matrix with a paste-like consistency with a poorer release of allergens. In the current study, subject no.…”
Section: Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 disadvantage with the use of high concentrations of neomycin in intradermal tests is the risk of an anaphylactoid inflammatory response that may be provoked by solutions exceeding 0.1% (0.05 or 0.1 ml tests) (3,48). However, this view is not held by all investigators (11,49). Another disadvantage of intradermal tests is a transient traumatic reaction that results from injury of injecting needles.…”
Section: Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation