Cross-shelf phytoplankton pigment variability in the California Current

Abstract

Five years of satellite ocean color data from the coastal zone color scanner (CZCS) data are used to calculate cross-shelf transects of phytoplankton pigment concentrations in the California Current and quantify their seasonal and interannual variability. Alongshore means over six regions, Washingtonnorthern Oregon (48.4-42.88N), Cape Blanco to Cape Mendocino (42.8-40.48N), northern California (40.4-37.88N), central California (37.8-34.58N), northern Baja (32.5-29.48N) and southern Baja (27.9-22.98N) are used to contrast latitudinal differences. The general seasonal cycle shows minimum cross-shelf pigment extensions in March (2.0 mg m À3 isoline within 80 km of shore), expansion of pigment concentrations offshore in April and May often to the annual maximum (2.0 mg m À3 isoline up to 200 km offshore), a mid-summer (July-August) reduction in cross-shelf extension followed by a late summer (September) expansion and a fall collapse back towards the coast by late October. Amplitude of this seasonal pattern is minimum along the northern Baja coast and strongest off central California. Strong interannual variability is evident in both the timing and strength of these seasonal features. The most latitudinally consistent pattern of interannual variability is of negative anomalies and reduced concentrations during the 1983 El Nino. Time series of cross-shelf pigment distribution are compared quantitatively with concurrent alongshore wind stress and wind mixing ðUÃ 3 Þ from each region. Maximum correlations occur when pigment lags wind forcing by 1 or 2 ten-day periods. Strongest correlations are in the region from Cape Blanco to Cape Mendocino. Correlations are weaker both in the Pacific Northwest and off Baja. Correlations which excluded the anomalous conditions of 1983 are stronger in the three regions from Cape Blanco south to Point Conception suggesting that connections to wind forcing are stronger during non-El Nino years in these regions. Lastly, preliminary comparisons of the CZCS seasonal cycles are made to those evident in the first 19 months of SeaWiFS chlorophyll data which include the strong 1997-98 El Nino. #

Large-scale movements and high-use areas of western Pacific leatherback turtles,Dermochelys coriacea

“…Leatherbacks forage in this area from early summer to late fall, when water temperatures reach their warmest annual levels and large jelly aggregations develop (Graham et al 2001). Turtles begin to depart the CCE when water temperatures drop in October-November and productivity decreases (Thomas and Strub 2001).…”

New approach for using remotely sensed chlorophyll a to identify seabird hotspots

“…Spatial and temporal patterns in primary productivity include latitudinal and longitudinal (onshore/offshore) variation and trends through time, interannual and decadal-scale variability, and relationships with bathymetry and coastal geomorphology (e.g. Strub et al 1991, Thomas & Strub 2001, Legaard & Thomas 2006, Palacios et al 2006, Henson & Thomas 2007a. None of these studies, however, quantified the persistence of chl a concentrations, nor examined the relationships of persistence metrics to consumer (e.g.…”

Coupling Between the Coastal Ocean and Yaquina Bay, Oregon: Importance of Oceanic Inputs Relative to Other Nitrogen Sources

“…Service et al (1998) found that off of Monterey Bay, CA, USA wind stress and water temperature were maximally correlated at a lag of 2-3 days and there was a correlation between fluorescence and water temperature and wind stress at lags of 4 days and 6-7 days, respectively, which is similar to our results. Thomas and Strub (2001) performed a cross-correlation analysis between wind forcing (longshore wind stress and wind mixing) and cross-shelf pigment variability. They found that on the shelf off of Washington and northern Oregon (including our study area) the pigment pattern metrics were poorly related to local alongshore winds.…”