2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2018.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross - site comparison of excitation-contraction coupling using impedance and field potential recordings in hiPSC cardiomyocytes

Abstract: With exceptions, hiPSC-CMs are sensitive and exhibit at least 10% delayed or shortened repolarization from pre-addition values and arrhythmia after drug application and thus can provide predictive cardiac electrophysiology data. The baseline electrophysiological parameters vary between iPS cells from different sources, therefore positive and negative control recordings are recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using CiPA as an example, the approach proposed was to identify proarrhythmic risk based on several key modalities including: (1) assessment of several major ion channels in transfected cell lines; (2) in silico modeling of the ion channel effects; (3) proarrhythmic assessment in hiPSC-CMs; and (4) clinical assessment of electrocardiograms from phase I human studies. Data that emerged from CiPA show that optical- and multielectrode array-based platforms using commercially sourced hiPSC-CMs enable an 87% accuracy in predicting proarrhythmic liability across geographically diverse testing laboratories ( Blinova et al , 2018 ), with similar studies being reported by others ( Bot et al , 2018 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Using CiPA as an example, the approach proposed was to identify proarrhythmic risk based on several key modalities including: (1) assessment of several major ion channels in transfected cell lines; (2) in silico modeling of the ion channel effects; (3) proarrhythmic assessment in hiPSC-CMs; and (4) clinical assessment of electrocardiograms from phase I human studies. Data that emerged from CiPA show that optical- and multielectrode array-based platforms using commercially sourced hiPSC-CMs enable an 87% accuracy in predicting proarrhythmic liability across geographically diverse testing laboratories ( Blinova et al , 2018 ), with similar studies being reported by others ( Bot et al , 2018 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In short, the CMs start beating regularly and synchronized approximately 48 h after thawing/seeding and they display normal action potential profiles. Furthermore, they have been shown to have an expected electrophysiological response to different drugs (Higa et al, 2016;Da Rocha et al, 2017;Bot et al, 2018;Stillitano et al, 2017). Electrophysiological studies performed on iPS-CMs derived from patients with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy show that the patient-specific CMs have more irregular action potentials and increased irregular contractility compared to control-CMs (Han et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2018 ) investigated human stem cell-derived CMs provided by four different suppliers in three different platforms on multiple sites and saw differences with FPDc ranging from 271–577 ms. Comparison of four commercial cardiomyocyte lines in another study confirmed differences at baseline level with FPD ranging from 246–548 ms, highlighting the need for rate control during drug screening ( Bot et al., 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%