2017
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2017.1406194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-slip in face-centered cubic metals: a general Escaig stress-dependent activation energy line tension model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this work, Liu et al [19] developed a variational line tension model for cross slip, which was in better quantitative agreement with respect to the results based on nudged elastic band model. Recently, Malka-Markovitz and Morderhai [12,13] proposed a line tension model to describe the cross-slip energy barrier as a function of the stress state, which was also in in agreement with previous atomistic results [20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on this work, Liu et al [19] developed a variational line tension model for cross slip, which was in better quantitative agreement with respect to the results based on nudged elastic band model. Recently, Malka-Markovitz and Morderhai [12,13] proposed a line tension model to describe the cross-slip energy barrier as a function of the stress state, which was also in in agreement with previous atomistic results [20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, it should be noticed that the estimation of the entropic barrier combining eqs. (12) and (16), with T m = 933 K, follows the trend of the MD simulation results, indicating that the MN compensation rule also holds for the biaxial case.…”
Section: Coupled Stressessupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar argument as that used by Essmann and Mughrabi [35] suggests that below a critical separation in the direction normal to the slip plane, the screw segments will tend to cross slip and annihilate, further hindering plastic deformation. The orientation dependence of cross slip [36][37][38] may then be responsible in part for the scatter in the mean slip line spacings. Furthermore, for any single band there is also a variation in the spacings that arises from spatial variations in the precipitate distribution and the random nature of the double cross slip events during the formation process.…”
Section: Deformation Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different DDD codes consider different forms for the free-energy barrier ( ). Most codes consider only the Schmid stresses (glide stresses) on the slip plane ℎ. for an immobile dislocation, assuming that the activation energy is obtained from mainly from constricting the partial dislocations and it decreases linearly with this stress component: Recently, we proposed an expression for the stress dependent activation free energy barrier [19,20]. In this model, which is a line-tension model, we employed a harmonic approximation (HA) for the interaction energy between the partial dislocations and The free-energy barrier implemented in the DDD simulation relies on the line tension model [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%