2001
DOI: 10.1002/dev.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐species investigations of prenatal experience, hatching behavior, and postnatal behavioral laterality

Abstract: Turning biases have been reported in some mammalian species, but less is known about such biases in nonmammalians. This study investigated turning biases in domestic chicks, bobwhite and Japanese quail, leopard geckos, and snapping turtles. Domestic chicks (white leghorn and bantam) and bobwhite quail demonstrate strong group laterality. Japanese quail chicks, snapping turtles, and leopard geckos demonstrate no significant group bias. Results are discussed with regard to differences in embryonic experience, ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observations made in this study add further support to previous findings (Casey & Sleigh, 2001). The hatching behaviors of domestic chicks and bobwhite quail are similar as evidenced by their shell remains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observations made in this study add further support to previous findings (Casey & Sleigh, 2001). The hatching behaviors of domestic chicks and bobwhite quail are similar as evidenced by their shell remains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Domestic chicks rarely make more than one full body rotation to escape the egg (Oppenheim, 1972), while bobwhite quail typically make anywhere from one to three full body rotations and as many as six full body rotations have been reported (Johnson, 1969). By way of contrast, Japanese quail often make less than one full body rotation (Casey & Sleigh, 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, animal research has shown that anticlockwise/leftward turning predominates in swimming dolphins, Tursiops truncatus (Sobel, Supin, & Myslobodsky, 1994), domestic chicks (Casey & Karpinski, 1999; Casey & Sleigh, 2001; Rogers, 1991), bobwhite quail (Casey & Sleigh, 2001), and ants (Hunt et al, 2014). Mohr et al (2004) assessed in 36 healthy human participants long-term spontaneous turning (with a lightweight, rechargeable hip-mounted device consisting of a position sensor and an electronic processing circuit), veering (tendency to deviate from linearity when traveling or walking without any visual cues) and stepping (deviations while stepping blindfolded on a given spot) behavior.…”
Section: Directionality Bias In Turning or Rotational Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the factors of reading or scanning direction and traffic rules do not apply for non-human animals. Researchers hypothesized that lateralization of some forms of visual behavior (leftward or rightward directionality bias) can be generated in avian species, such as pigeons and domestic chickens, by exposing the developing embryos to biased prenatal sensory experiences (unilateral light stimulation to one eye just before hatching; Casey & Sleigh, 2001; Manns & Strökens, 2014; Rogers, 1990; Rogers, 1991). Additionally, chicks hatched from eggs incubated in completely dark conditions do not develop any asymmetry in the visual pathways and visual behavior in categorization of food items and in responding to predators (Rogers, 2012).…”
Section: A Dynamic Model For the Origins Of Directionality Biases mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When hatching behaviors were interrupted or eliminated, population laterality was not evident and individual laterality was reduced in these two species. By contrast, control Japanese quail chicks showed only weak individual laterality for turning bias and footedness and did not demonstrate population level lateralization for either measure (see also Casey & Sleigh, ). Disruption of hatch behaviors further decreased these biases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%