1981
DOI: 10.1121/1.385314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-spectral method of measuring acoustic intensity by correcting phase and gain mismatch errors by microphone calibration

Abstract: The accuracy of measuring acoustic intensity using two closely spaced microphones is examined. The phase and gain mismatch errors are corrected by measuring the transfer function between the two microphone systems exposing them to the same sound (phase and pressure levels) over a wide range of frequencies. The accuracy of the measurement method was verified by creating a sound field in an anechoic room and by generating plane-wave propagation inside a long length of pipe with an anechoic termination. The measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…24 This relative calibration (and the subsequent corrections of the measurements) is realized by exposing them to the same sound field in a small cavity, and by measuring their cross-spectra in the frequency range of interest. 29 As an example, Fig. 2 presents the four coefficients T pp , T pu , T up and T uu (amplitude and phase) of the transfer matrix from 50 to 200 Hz and for three different values of heat power Q.…”
Section: Measurement Of the Transfer Matrix Of The Thermoacousticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 This relative calibration (and the subsequent corrections of the measurements) is realized by exposing them to the same sound field in a small cavity, and by measuring their cross-spectra in the frequency range of interest. 29 As an example, Fig. 2 presents the four coefficients T pp , T pu , T up and T uu (amplitude and phase) of the transfer matrix from 50 to 200 Hz and for three different values of heat power Q.…”
Section: Measurement Of the Transfer Matrix Of The Thermoacousticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Measurement Bandwidth: Microphones, even with manufacturer guaranteed tolerances are known to have substantial phase response mismatches [27]. It is assumed that most of these mismatches can be digitally equalized, albeit with small remaining discrepancies [28]. Even then, the phase mismatches of the individual array components are an important source of error [29], [30].…”
Section: ) Magnitude Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining the particle velocity vector, the time-averaged acoustic intensity can be calculated using (28). b) G.R.A.S.…”
Section: ) Comparison With Conventional Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,27 In particular, a relative calibration of the six microphones has been made preliminarily by exposing them to the same sound field 28 in the frequency range of interest ͑f ͓150 Hz, 200 Hz͔͒, in order to prevent from large errors due to phase shifts between the sensors ͑inherent to the sensors themselves͒. 25,27 In particular, a relative calibration of the six microphones has been made preliminarily by exposing them to the same sound field 28 in the frequency range of interest ͑f ͓150 Hz, 200 Hz͔͒, in order to prevent from large errors due to phase shifts between the sensors ͑inherent to the sensors themselves͒.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%