2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-task cue utilisation and situational awareness in simulated air traffic control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cue utilization was established from the echocardiography edition of EXPERTise 2.0 measures, based on the participants' performance across five tasks. Consistent with previous research (e.g., Brouwers et al, 2017;Falkland & Wiggins, 2019), a k-means cluster analysis delineated two groups and revealed a pattern of centroids which confirmed the hypothesis concerning the behaviors associated with differences in cue utilization. Thirteen participants recorded a pattern of behavior consistent with lower cue utilization while 28 participants recorded behavior that reflected higher cue utilization (see Table 2).…”
Section: Cue Utilizationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Cue utilization was established from the echocardiography edition of EXPERTise 2.0 measures, based on the participants' performance across five tasks. Consistent with previous research (e.g., Brouwers et al, 2017;Falkland & Wiggins, 2019), a k-means cluster analysis delineated two groups and revealed a pattern of centroids which confirmed the hypothesis concerning the behaviors associated with differences in cue utilization. Thirteen participants recorded a pattern of behavior consistent with lower cue utilization while 28 participants recorded behavior that reflected higher cue utilization (see Table 2).…”
Section: Cue Utilizationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A more recent study in vessel traffic also proposed a smart alarm system that involved various multimodal cues, including sound, geometric and haptic cues to enhance SA of operators (Li et al, 2019a). These collective findings might be explained by the fact that participants who demonstrate high cue utilisation have higher SA (Falkland and Wiggins, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the results of the present study have implications for selection, training and task design in high risk, high consequence environments, where operators are required to manage interruptive tasks under higher workload conditions (Westbrook et al, 2018). For selection purposes, distinguishing higher from lower cue utilisation may provide opportunities to identify applicants who are more or less likely able to sustain greater performance while managing interruptions, particularly during the initial stages of skill acquisition where patterns of system behaviour have yet to be acquired (Falkland & Wiggins, 2019). Consequently, operators might be placed into separate workflow streams, where situations that are likely to involve interruptive tasks are restricted to those operators with relatively higher cue utilisation (Falkland et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability and construct validity of the driving edition of EXPERTise have been tested in a number of domains, where the typologies formed from performance across the combination of tasks have differentiated performance when learning to operate an Unmanned Aerial System (Wiggins, Brouwers, et al, 2014), a simulated rail control task (Brouwers, Wiggins, Helton, et al, 2016; Brouwers, Wiggins, Griffin, et al, 2017), a simulated air traffic control task (Falkland & Wiggins, 2019), and the management of interruptions during a simulated rail control task ( Falkland et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%