2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0745-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-validation of an algorithm detecting acute gastroenteritis episodes from prescribed drug dispensing data in France: comparison with clinical data reported in a primary care surveillance system, winter seasons 2014/15 to 2016/17

Abstract: Background This study compares an algorithm to detect acute gastroenteritis (AG) episodes from drug dispensing data to the validated data reported in a primary care surveillance system in France. Methods We used drug dispensing data collected in a drugstore database and data collected by primary care physicians involved in a French surveillance network, from season 2014/15 to 2016/17. We used an adapted version of an AG discrimination algorithm to identify AG episodes f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of AGE episodes from prescribed drug dispensing data was done by using an algorithm that identifies drug dispensing events corresponding to AGE treatments, taking into account patient characteristics, the delay between the prescription and drug dispensing event, and the type, number, and quantity of drugs dispensed. 29,30 The types of drugs potentially prescribed to treat an AGE episode included oral rehydration salts, antiemetics, probiotic antidiarrheals, intestinal antipropulsives, intestinal absorbents, intestinal anti-infectious agents, and antispasmodic agents. Coprescriptions of these drugs and antibiotics, antineoplastic agents used in cancer therapy, gastric antacids, drugs used for inflammatory bowel diseases, or antiemetics in injectable form were considered to treat a disease other than AGE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection of AGE episodes from prescribed drug dispensing data was done by using an algorithm that identifies drug dispensing events corresponding to AGE treatments, taking into account patient characteristics, the delay between the prescription and drug dispensing event, and the type, number, and quantity of drugs dispensed. 29,30 The types of drugs potentially prescribed to treat an AGE episode included oral rehydration salts, antiemetics, probiotic antidiarrheals, intestinal antipropulsives, intestinal absorbents, intestinal anti-infectious agents, and antispasmodic agents. Coprescriptions of these drugs and antibiotics, antineoplastic agents used in cancer therapy, gastric antacids, drugs used for inflammatory bowel diseases, or antiemetics in injectable form were considered to treat a disease other than AGE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement was strong in all age subgroups; the highest correlation was observed among adults aged 15 to 64 years ( r ≥ 0.87) and the lowest among elderly patients ( r ≥ 0.75). 30…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incident AGE was defined using a drug dispensing algorithm previously found to correlate with an indicator for AGE in French general practitioner records. 6 Vilcu and colleagues 5 found a significant association between PPI use and AGE (relative risk, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.72-1.90), translating to a number needed to harm of 153 patients. Of note, the authors also found a significant association between AGE and histamine 2 receptor antagonists in a sensitivity analysis (adjusted relative risk, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.27-3.39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference reduces the specificity (PPV) in comparison of our algorithm. The authors have found a strong agreement in the dynamic of mAGE activity in winter, between the estimate derived from the LTD data and the reporting of a primary care surveillance system (GP Sentinelles network) with a correlation coefficient between 0.84 and 0.94 on the mAGE weekly rate [19]. The work of Vilcu et al covers an estimation of regional or national mAGE rate during winter seasons with an exclusion of overseas departments and is not suitable for a local mAGE surveillance.…”
Section: External Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 70%