2019
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Validation of the Monoclonal Antibody Das-1 in Identification of High-Risk Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the use of 10‐fold cross‐validation substantiates the validity of the model. The 10‐fold cross‐validation was used to validate the model, which divides the raw data into 10 groups (10‐fold); each subset data are used as a verification set, and the remaining K − 1 subset data are used as a training set, so that K models are obtained 24 . Cross‐validation effectively utilizes limited data, making the test results of the model more robust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of 10‐fold cross‐validation substantiates the validity of the model. The 10‐fold cross‐validation was used to validate the model, which divides the raw data into 10 groups (10‐fold); each subset data are used as a verification set, and the remaining K − 1 subset data are used as a training set, so that K models are obtained 24 . Cross‐validation effectively utilizes limited data, making the test results of the model more robust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unique immunoreactivity has been demonstrated on resected pancreas specimens with HGD-IPMN and PDAC, leading to the most recent study evaluating its applicability to preoperatively sampled cyst fluid [52]. Das et al investigated 169 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions across 4 institutions and found that non-mucinous and low-risk cysts displayed little reactivity, whereas HGD-IPMN and MCN lesions had significantly higher reactivity (p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 88.3% and a specificity of 92.7% when stratifying for HGD or invasive malignancy [52]. Based on their internal comparative evaluation, Das-1 reactivity has significant potential in distinguishing HGD or malignancy.…”
Section: Cep and Mab Das-1mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The murine Das-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was created to react with a normal colon epithelial protein (CEP), based on the observation that these cell types are not normally present in gastric and pancreatic epithelium and are prone to developing invasive carcinoma when present [51]. This unique immunoreactivity has been demonstrated on resected pancreas specimens with HGD-IPMN and PDAC, leading to the most recent study evaluating its applicability to preoperatively sampled cyst fluid [52]. Das et al investigated 169 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions across 4 institutions and found that non-mucinous and low-risk cysts displayed little reactivity, whereas HGD-IPMN and MCN lesions had significantly higher reactivity (p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 88.3% and a specificity of 92.7% when stratifying for HGD or invasive malignancy [52].…”
Section: Cep and Mab Das-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confocal laser endomicroscopy showed to be superior to cyst fluid CEA and cytology, and new parameters (e.g., papillary epithelial width, darkness) may be evaluated to detect high-grade dyplasia in IPMNs [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. For example, evaluation of cyst fluid CEA may differentiate between mucinous and non-mucinous cystic neoplasm (CEA > 192 ng/mL suggests an MCN), yet it is not helpful in distinguishing MCNs versus IPMNs or benign versus HGD lesions [ 45 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Following cell death, genetic materials are released into the cystic fluid making the detection of IPMN-associated DNA mutations possible.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%