2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-View Asymmetric Metric Learning for Unsupervised Person Re-Identification

Abstract: While metric learning is important for Person reidentification (RE-ID), a significant problem in visual surveillance for cross-view pedestrian matching, existing metric models for RE-ID are mostly based on supervised learning that requires quantities of labeled samples in all pairs of camera views for training. However, this limits their scalabilities to realistic applications, in which a large amount of data over multiple disjoint camera views is available but not labelled. To overcome the problem, we propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
246
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
246
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These works mainly can be divided into two categories: 1) discovering pseudo labels for target dataset, and 2) reducing the source-target discrepancy in a common label space. For the first category, methods use a labeled source dataset to initialize a re-ID model and explore pseudo labels for target dataset based on clustering [10], [55], associating label with labeled source dataset [57], assigning label with nearest-neighbors [5], [22], [23], [54], or regarding camera style counterparts as positive sample [64]. These methods are closely related to our work in that using the relationship between target samples to refine the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works mainly can be divided into two categories: 1) discovering pseudo labels for target dataset, and 2) reducing the source-target discrepancy in a common label space. For the first category, methods use a labeled source dataset to initialize a re-ID model and explore pseudo labels for target dataset based on clustering [10], [55], associating label with labeled source dataset [57], assigning label with nearest-neighbors [5], [22], [23], [54], or regarding camera style counterparts as positive sample [64]. These methods are closely related to our work in that using the relationship between target samples to refine the model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2 three most recently proposed metrics CVAML [40], WARCA [36], and L-1 Graph [37] are compared with our IRM3 approach. All the three metrics have assumption of unimodal intercamera transform, rather than multimodal image space.…”
Section: Results On Cuhk01mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market-1501. In Table 1, we compare our proposed model with the use of Bag-of-Words (BoW) [58] for matching (i.e., no transfer), four unsupervised re-ID approaches, including UMDL [42], PUL [15], CAMEL [54] and TAUDL [29], and seven cross-dataset re-ID methods, including PTGAN [51], SPGAN [12], TJ-AIDL [49], MMFA [35], HHL [61], CFSM [3] and ARN [32]. From this table, we see that our model achieved very promising [12] and HHL [61], we note that our model is able to generate cross-domain images conditioned on various poses rather than few camera styles.…”
Section: Quantitative Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%