2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.1.032031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossed Andreev reflection in InSb flake Josephson junctions

Abstract: We study superconducting quantum interference in InSb flake Josephson junctions. An even-odd effect in the amplitude and periodicity of the superconducting quantum interference pattern is found. Interestingly, the occurrence of this pattern coincides with enhanced conduction at both edges of the flake, as is deduced from measuring a SQUID pattern at reduced gate voltages. We identify the specific crystal facet of the edge with enhanced conduction, and confirm this by measuring multiple devices. Furthermore, we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Δ y < d Au the NWs meet “head‐to‐head” and the axial growth is interrupted preventing the formation of four‐terminal crosses. [ 25,26 ] This situation is discussed in the Supporting Information (Figures ). For Δ y exceeding the final NW diameter d ( t f ), the two NWs remain separated, while for a finite off‐set d Au < Δ y < d ( t f ) the resulting structure and the possibility of forming connected four‐terminal crosses depends on the relation between Δ y , d Au , d ( t MP ), and d ( t ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Δ y < d Au the NWs meet “head‐to‐head” and the axial growth is interrupted preventing the formation of four‐terminal crosses. [ 25,26 ] This situation is discussed in the Supporting Information (Figures ). For Δ y exceeding the final NW diameter d ( t f ), the two NWs remain separated, while for a finite off‐set d Au < Δ y < d ( t f ) the resulting structure and the possibility of forming connected four‐terminal crosses depends on the relation between Δ y , d Au , d ( t MP ), and d ( t ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 7 c, λ e reaches values of ∼500 nm for V BG ≥ 25 V, which compares favorably with literature. 10 , 11 , 21 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with InSb/InAlSb quantum well systems, the free-standing InSb nanosheets have advantages in direct contact by metals, including superconducting materials, in easy transfer to different substrates, and in convenient fabrication of dual-gate structures. With use of free-standing InSb nanosheets, lateral quantum devices, such as planar quantum dots 31 and superconducting Josephson junctions [32][33][34] , have been successfully fabricated. A most intriguing perspective of these layered materials is to build topological superconducting structures from them, in which Majorana fermions and parafermions 35,36 can be created and manipulated, enabling a different route of developments towards topological quantum computation technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%