2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3532817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossed-beam energy transfer in implosion experiments on OMEGA

Abstract: Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of implosion experiments on the OMEGA laser system [Boehly et al., Opt. Commun. 133, 495 (1997)] show that energy transfer between crossing laser beams can reduce laser absorption by 10%–20%. A new quantitative model for the crossed-beam energy transfer has been developed, allowing one to simulate the coupling of multiple beams in the expanding corona of implosion targets. Scattered-light and bang-time measurements show good agreement with predictions of this model when nonlo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including LPI effects in radhydro codes is challenging: coupling a paraxial and radhydro model has been done, but is usually impractical on current computers [11]. CBET calculations either postprocess plasma conditions from a hydro simulation with no CBET [6,12], or are directly implemented "inline" in simulations that describe lasers with ray-tracing [13,14] or paraxial complex geometric optics [15]. SRS is usually treated by removing the escaping light from the incident laser, though recent work has included SRS-produced superthermal electrons in direct-drive hydrodynamic modeling [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including LPI effects in radhydro codes is challenging: coupling a paraxial and radhydro model has been done, but is usually impractical on current computers [11]. CBET calculations either postprocess plasma conditions from a hydro simulation with no CBET [6,12], or are directly implemented "inline" in simulations that describe lasers with ray-tracing [13,14] or paraxial complex geometric optics [15]. SRS is usually treated by removing the escaping light from the incident laser, though recent work has included SRS-produced superthermal electrons in direct-drive hydrodynamic modeling [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…each beam had the same, averaged power and hence effects due to power imbalance were not taken into account in the calculations. Hydra's total laser energy was decreased by 20% to approximately account for cross beam energy transfer (CBET) [29,30] and other absorption effects not included in the simulations. This adjustment was also needed in order to improve the matching between simulation and experimental bang times.…”
Section: X-ray Imaging Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crossed-beam energy transfer (CBET) [8][9][10] has been identified as a source of reduced laser absorption in direct-drive experiments [11]. Laser light that is transmitted around the target can interact with the central region of incident beams to scatter light from the Mach-1 surface, reducing the ontarget absorbed energy.…”
Section: Crossed-beam Energy Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When CBET is included, the simulations are in much better agreement with the experimental measurements. CBET is modeled in 1-D simulations (including 3-D ray tracing and known focal-spot profiles) by considering pair-wise interactions of rays and calculating the energy transfer between rays using the stimulated Brillouin scattering gain rate for each pair [11]. The standard OMEGA phase plates [13] with a nominal diameter of 860 m were used in these experiments.…”
Section: Crossed-beam Energy Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation