“…Moreover, we enrolled a large patient cohort which exceeded the size of study populations investigated in terms of CCD so far (mean: 51.1; range: 18-113). 13,14,17,22,25,26,28,52 Still, we cannot fully rule out the possibility of having underestimated the frequency of CCD as we counted only those cases as CCD positive, that show hemodynamic alterations suggestive of CCD in at least two perfusion parameter maps. However, artifacts on single perfusion maps can often be observed in CT imaging of the posterior fossa and this approach helped to limit the number of false-positive findings.…”