2010
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2010.247.477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossed pointed categories and their equivariantizations

Abstract: We propose a notion, quasiabelian third cohomology of crossed modules, which generalizes Eilenberg and Mac Lane's abelian and Ospel's quasiabelian cohomology. We classify crossed pointed categories in terms of it. We apply the process of equivariantization to the latter to obtain braided fusion categories, which may be viewed as generalizations of the categories of modules over twisted Drinfeld doubles of finite groups. As a consequence, we obtain a description of all braided group-theoretical categories. We g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivariantization C G with respect to this action is equivalent to the category of finite-dimensional representations of the twisted quantum double D ω G (see [5,Lemma 6.3…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivariantization C G with respect to this action is equivalent to the category of finite-dimensional representations of the twisted quantum double D ω G (see [5,Lemma 6.3…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By [25,Theorem 5.3] every braided group-theoretical fusion category B can be obtained as a gauging of a pointed G-crossed braided fusion category C. The pair (G, Inv(C)) is an ordinary crossed module, where the G-action on X is induced by the G-action on C and the morphism ∂ : X → G is defined by the G-grading.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The category M(X) associated to a crossed module is known to be modular, iff the boundary map ∂ is an isomorphism [13,Proposition 5.6]. In this case, it is equivalent to the representation category of the Drinfeld double of a finite group.…”
Section: Definition 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a proof of this assertion that does not directly use Bruigières' criterion, we refer to [13,Proposition 5.6]. …”
Section: Remark 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation