2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2019.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossed products of nuclear C⁎-algebras and their traces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the amenable case we recover quasidiagonality. That a certain coboundary condition is equivalent to stable finiteness is reminiscent of the work of Pimsner [30] and Brown [8] and also appears in noncommutative C * -systems [10,31,34]. In Theorem 7.3 we establish that, again for minimal groupoids with totally disconnected unit space, if every element of S(G) is properly infinite, then C * (G) is purely infinite; moreover these conditions are equivalent if S(G) is almost unperforated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the amenable case we recover quasidiagonality. That a certain coboundary condition is equivalent to stable finiteness is reminiscent of the work of Pimsner [30] and Brown [8] and also appears in noncommutative C * -systems [10,31,34]. In Theorem 7.3 we establish that, again for minimal groupoids with totally disconnected unit space, if every element of S(G) is properly infinite, then C * (G) is purely infinite; moreover these conditions are equivalent if S(G) is almost unperforated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We now state a general result used to prove Theorem C. The equivalence (2)⇔(3) of Proposition 2.9 have been considered previously, see for example [13,Proposition 3.1]. For results related to (3)⇒(2) when A is unital we refer to [39,Theorem 4.2]. Proposition 2.9.…”
Section: Lemma 26 ([8]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, under the assumptions of Theorem 5.10, one can conclude that the inclusion of K 0 (A α ) into K 0 (A) is positively existential. Here we regard K 0 -group as structures in the language of dimension groups (G, +, u) endowed with domains of quantifications to be interpreted as the subsets {x ∈ G : − nu ≤ x ≤ nu} for n ∈ N. This corresponds to the notion of ultrapower of dimension groups considered in [46]. G is a compact quantum group, and (B, β) is a G-C*-algebra.…”
Section: The Rokhlin Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%