2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5866(01)00113-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossflow microfiltration – state of the art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
90
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Altmann [84]. Cheryan [85] claimed that particles which are bigger than the 408 membrane pores could be induced under shear force generated by cross-flow 409 velocity, this caused the membranes to become mobilized on the membrane surface 410 thus limiting the effect of fouling.…”
Section: Operational Conditions Of Water Purification Device 364mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altmann [84]. Cheryan [85] claimed that particles which are bigger than the 408 membrane pores could be induced under shear force generated by cross-flow 409 velocity, this caused the membranes to become mobilized on the membrane surface 410 thus limiting the effect of fouling.…”
Section: Operational Conditions Of Water Purification Device 364mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the operational parameters of the system and the properties of the suspension, crossflow filtration can be operated at equilibrium flux rates similar to the clean water flux (Bacchin et al 2006) or can be as low as 5 to 10% of the initial flux at the start of filtration operations (Christensen et al 2009). As further discussed in 3.3 Christensen, the lowest steady state fluxes typically occur for dispersions with particles in the colloidal size range (i.e., 10 nm to 1 μm) (Sethi andWiesner 1997, Ripperger andAltmann 2002).…”
Section: The Impact Of Time Process Operating Conditions and Propermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being stated, cake formation is considered to be the dominant form of filter resistance and filter fouling (Ripperger andAltmann 2002, Christensen et al 2009) and is the focus of many filter fouling and flux evolution studies. The applicability of this assertion to the broad range of filtration encountered in the literature is not clear, as a recent study by found that models for both pore blocking and cake formation had to be considered when trying to model the fouling of alumina membranes of varying pore size (0.2 to 5 m) during filtration of a Cr(OH) 3 suspension.…”
Section: The Impact Of Time Process Operating Conditions and Propermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richardson and Nassehi [42] developed a Streamline Upwind Petrov Galerkin (SUPG) finite element scheme to model the free flow domains having curved porous boundaries with a specialised case of cross-flow membrane filtrations. Ripperger and Altmann [6] have discussed in detail the historical developments in the cross-flow filtration along with the mechanisms behind particle depositions on the membrane surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%