Crossing boundaries: An exploration of how three Social Studies teachers understand and teach patriotism in Singapore

Abstract

Crossing boundaries: an exploration of how three social studies teachers understand and teach patriotism in singapore aBstraCtIn 1965 Singapore became independent after a two-year merger with Malaysia and over 100 years of British colonization. Since then, the government has been inculcating patriotism in its citizens through educational policies such as the introduction of Social Studies at secondary school. This process of education for patriotism is interesting in the case of Singapore in two respects: how teachers understand the link between patriotism and loyalty to the government; and whether teachers dare to cross boundaries to engage students in discussions that may challenge pro-government views. This study explores the perceptions and practices of three Social Studies teachers to address two issues. First, how do Social Studies teachers understand 'patriotism'? Second, how do they teach it within or beyond boundaries? The findings show that teachers did not think that patriotism meant loyalty to the government; instead it meant loyalty to one another as Singapore citizens. Though the translation of teachers' understandings of patriotism into the classroom differed from teacher to teacher, in terms of helping students think critically, there were elements of crossing the boundaries set by the ruling party. 80

Building a democratic society: exploring Singapore students ' understandings of democracy

“…The students' experiences indicated that lessons were conducted in a "teaching by the book" manner (Bixby and Pace, 2008a), more geared towards passing of exams rather than gaining practical democratic knowledge. It is also likely that teachers, conditioned by the "climates of conservatism and censorship" present in Singapore, were wary of bringing up controversial topics for class discussion (Cornbleth, 2001;Chua and Sim, 2014).…”

Postmodern patriotism: teachers’ perceptions of loyalty to Singapore

“…Of them, Harry exemplified nationalistic patriotism most. In his arrangement of the qualities of good citizenship, he created a construct called “the ability to question, balanced with respect for authority” where he explained that citizens must not overstep boundaries (Chua and Sim, 2015), but fulfill their responsibilities to the state (Figure 2). Harry conflated patriotism with citizenship, and was positive about patriotism.…”

“…It could just as well mean that they have a different definition of it (Chua and Sim, 2016). For example, these teachers clearly saw patriotism in a more civic than a critical sense (Chua and Sim, 2015). Undoubtedly, patriotism is a tool used by the PAP government to build a cohesive society (Chia, 2015).…”

Political assumptions underlying pedagogies of national education: The case of student teachers teaching ‘British values’ in England

“…Theory and research in citizenship education has identified different pedagogical approaches for the education of national identities (e.g. Westheimer, 2006;Merry, 2009;Hand & Pearce, 2011;Chua & Sim, 2014). These approaches are not exclusive 322 E. Sant & C. Hanley to questions of national identity-they can also be applied more widely to citizenship, religious and social studies education (Jackson, 2004;Davies et al, 2005;Hess, 2009)-and are likely to contribute to both the cognitive and the affective domain (Schulz et al, 2010).…”

“…Processes of inclusion and exclusion derived from nationally orientated education have been critically examined in a number of contexts (e.g. Chua & Sim, ; Sant, ). In the specific case of the UK, Prime Minister Gordon Brown started a new debate on ‘Britishness’ in 2006 and since then several studies have examined the educational implications of promoting Britishness (e.g.…”