2009
DOI: 10.1306/06250909039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossing conjugate normal faults in field exposures and seismic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fault reactivation must be taken into account when assessing the leakage potential of a reservoir interval. Methods to assess the risk of breaching seal units by the juxtaposition of permeable strata across faults include detailed assessments of fault geometry and the use of in-situ stresses (Ferrill et al, 2009;Jones and Hillis, 2003;Morris et al, 1996). However, the absence of borehole breakout data for the Espírito Santo Basin made necessary the use of paleostress data, and juxtaposition diagrams, to provide evidence for reservoir compartmentalisation associated with fault reactivation.…”
Section: Structural Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault reactivation must be taken into account when assessing the leakage potential of a reservoir interval. Methods to assess the risk of breaching seal units by the juxtaposition of permeable strata across faults include detailed assessments of fault geometry and the use of in-situ stresses (Ferrill et al, 2009;Jones and Hillis, 2003;Morris et al, 1996). However, the absence of borehole breakout data for the Espírito Santo Basin made necessary the use of paleostress data, and juxtaposition diagrams, to provide evidence for reservoir compartmentalisation associated with fault reactivation.…”
Section: Structural Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of them independently explain the formation of the v-shaped horst structure in the center of the study area. Scenario A assumes a positive flower structure and scenario B conjugate crossing normal faults (e.g., Ferrill et al 2000Ferrill et al , 2009 to be the major factor of the structural evolution.…”
Section: Kinematic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can either be conjugate fault sets (e.g., Zhao and Johnson, 1991;Nicol et al, 1995;Ferrill et al, 2009;Nixon et al, 2011) that formed in the same stress system, or multiple fault sets that form from the overprinting of two or more stress systems (Davatzes et al, 2003;Bailey et al, 2005). The latter can form new faults with different orientations and/or cause reactivation of pre-existing faults (e.g., Kim et al, 2001), which can also have a strong influence on the development of later fault sets (e.g., Segall and Pollard, 1983;Bailey et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can also act as fluid barriers compartmentalizing reservoirs (Bouvier et al, 1989;Leveille et al, 1997), which is a major uncertainty in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of a reservoir in the hydrocarbon industry (Jolley et al, 2010). Furthermore, fault interaction and reactivation are important when assessing reservoir quality and heterogeneity, as they can contribute to damage zones as well as cause variations in bed thinning, attenuation and trap integrity (i.e., Fossen et al, 2005;Gartrell et al, 2006;Ferrill et al, 2009). Such affects often occur around fault intersection lines or branch lines, hence, being able to identify and characterize different fault interactions, within a network, is essential when interpreting reservoir deformation and evaluating communication between fault bound compartments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%