2020
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.3184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossing new frontiers: extending tephrochronology as a global geoscientific research tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(152 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In tephrochronology (Lowe, 2011) ash layers of known age and origin can be used as reliable dating tools and correlation targets. This approach plays an increasingly important role in Quaternary stratigraphy (see Abbott et al, 2020 and references therein) as for example, the accuracy of luminescence numerical dating, the choice of method of dating the emplacement time of loess deposits is still impacted by many limiting factors such as large offsets between the different methods currently applied on the same sample (Avram et al, 2020), or even between different grain-size aliquots (e.g., Timar-Gabor et al, 2011;Veres et al, 2018). The most prominent tephra layer preserved in Eastern European loess and archeological deposits is the Campanian Ignimbrite/Y5 tephra (Veres et al, 2013;Giaccio et al, 2017).…”
Section: Tephra Layers As Widespread Marker Horizons Using Magnetic Proxies To Highlight the Presence Of Tephra Layers In Loessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tephrochronology (Lowe, 2011) ash layers of known age and origin can be used as reliable dating tools and correlation targets. This approach plays an increasingly important role in Quaternary stratigraphy (see Abbott et al, 2020 and references therein) as for example, the accuracy of luminescence numerical dating, the choice of method of dating the emplacement time of loess deposits is still impacted by many limiting factors such as large offsets between the different methods currently applied on the same sample (Avram et al, 2020), or even between different grain-size aliquots (e.g., Timar-Gabor et al, 2011;Veres et al, 2018). The most prominent tephra layer preserved in Eastern European loess and archeological deposits is the Campanian Ignimbrite/Y5 tephra (Veres et al, 2013;Giaccio et al, 2017).…”
Section: Tephra Layers As Widespread Marker Horizons Using Magnetic Proxies To Highlight the Presence Of Tephra Layers In Loessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these have signi cant age uncertainty or debatable H. sapiens apomorphy 10 . A principal method for constraining the fossil ages is the use of single-crystal 40 Ar/ 39 Ar isotope dating applied to stratigraphically-associated volcanic ash (tephra) beds [11][12][13] . Some tephra deposits consist largely of glass and lack suitable crystals for dating.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To build a consistent chronostratigraphic framework, it is common practice to investigate loess-palaeosol deposits with a multidisciplinary approach. In addition to magnetostratigraphy, a reliable geochronology, biostratigraphy and tephrochronology are mandatory to interpret the results of such investigations [28,[303][304][305][306].…”
Section: Promising Geochronometric Tools For Further Development Of a Unified Ukrainian-danube Loess Stratigraphic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%