2008
DOI: 10.1177/154193120805202207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossmodal Links in Attention in the Driving Environment: The Roles of Cueing Modality, Signal Timing, and Workload

Abstract: Multimodal information presentation has been proposed as a means to support timesharing in complex data-rich environments. To ensure the effectiveness of this approach, it is necessary to consider performance effects of recently discovered crossmodal spatial and temporal links in attention, as well as their interaction with other performance-shaping factors. The main goals of this research were to confirm that performance effects of crossmodal links in spatial attention scale to complex environments and to exa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traffic scenes were created with a STISIM Drive TM simulator housed in a 2.40 GHz computer. STISIM Drive TM is a medium-fidelity driving software package (Tilak et al, 2008;Tippey et al, 2014), and is widely used to evaluate driving performance (Freund et al, 2002;2005;Lee et al, 2003;Shechtman, 2010). Data collected with STISIM Drive TM have been shown…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic scenes were created with a STISIM Drive TM simulator housed in a 2.40 GHz computer. STISIM Drive TM is a medium-fidelity driving software package (Tilak et al, 2008;Tippey et al, 2014), and is widely used to evaluate driving performance (Freund et al, 2002;2005;Lee et al, 2003;Shechtman, 2010). Data collected with STISIM Drive TM have been shown…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the magnitude of these differences may vary depending on target location (front/rear) and modality (visual/auditory). We assume that visual cue will be the most effective in frontal space [Chica et al 2007;Schmitt et al 2000], followed closely by auditory cues [Driver and Spence 1998;Tilak et al 2008]. Auditory may be more effective than the intra-modal visual condition for the rear space [Ho and Spence 2005;Lee and Spence 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only studies using an auditory cue and a visual target were conducted at 360 • [ Lee and Spence 2015]. We assume that using a visual cue and a visual target will be the most effective in frontal space [Chica et al 2007;Schmitt et al 2000], followed closely by using an auditory cue and a visual target [Driver and Spence 1998b;Tilak et al 2008]. Auditory cue and visual target may be more effective than the intramodal visual condition for the rear space [Ho and Spence 2005;Lee and Spence 2015].…”
Section: Real-life Study At 360 •mentioning
confidence: 99%