1991
DOI: 10.1143/ptps.106.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossover between Cooper-Pair Condensation and Bose-Einstein Condensation of “Di-Electronic Molecules” in Two-Dimensional Superconductors

Abstract: The problem on crossover between the Cooper-pair condensation and the Bose-Einstein condensation of “di-electronic molecules” in two-dimensional superconductors is discussed. a result based on the Nozières and Schmitt-Rink formalism is reviewed and a preliminary result beyond their formalism is presented. In the latter, effect of repulsion between electron pairs due to the exchange effect among constituent electrons plays a crucial role.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-over of two regions was first formulated at T = 0 by Leggett [ 330] and extended to the finite temperature by Nozières and Schmitt-Rink [ 331]. After that, the application to the two-dimensional system has been investigated [ 332,333,334,335]. These two regions are continuously described by adjusting the chemical potential.…”
Section: Mf Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-over of two regions was first formulated at T = 0 by Leggett [ 330] and extended to the finite temperature by Nozières and Schmitt-Rink [ 331]. After that, the application to the two-dimensional system has been investigated [ 332,333,334,335]. These two regions are continuously described by adjusting the chemical potential.…”
Section: Mf Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2D there is, however, a more fundamental problem with the T -matrix approximation used in any, including the fully self-consistent, form. The essence of the problem is rather well-known: since the superconducting fluctuations are treated in an RPA-like or Gaussian approximation the BKT transition is not recovered by a T -matrix approach [95,92,135] (see also [200,201], where the effect of interaction between fluctuations was considered). One may hope however to derive BKT physics, or to be more exact the properties of the system for T < T BKT 21 only going beyond the T -matrix approximation, e.g.…”
Section: Limitations Of the T -Matrix Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11) The importance of the strong coupling superconductivity has been proposed 10,12,13,15,14) on the basis of the well-known Nozières and Schmitt-Rink (NSR) theory. 16,17) Furthermore, the strong coupling superconductivity has been phenomenologically proposed by Geshkenbein et al 18) with reference to the sign problem of the fluctuational Hall effect. 19) We have previously shown that the pseudogap phenomena are naturally understood by considering the resonance scattering due to the strong superconducting fluctuations.…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%