2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.90.062136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossover from rotational to stochastic sandpile universality in the random rotational sandpile model

Abstract: In the rotational sandpile model, either the clockwise or the anti-clockwise toppling rule is assigned to all the lattice sites. It has all the features of a stochastic sandpile model but belongs to a different universality class than the Manna class. A crossover from rotational to Manna universality class is studied by constructing a random rotational sandpile model and assigning randomly clockwise and anti-clockwise rotational toppling rules to the lattice sites. The steady state and the respective critical … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relation is well satisfied within the error bar by the measured exponents. Note that this relation is also satisfied for SSM on 2D square lattice [41] though the value of ζ equal to 1 there. The difference between Hurst exponent and Roughness exponent appeared from system size dependent correlation function as was observed in Ref.…”
Section: Toppling Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This relation is well satisfied within the error bar by the measured exponents. Note that this relation is also satisfied for SSM on 2D square lattice [41] though the value of ζ equal to 1 there. The difference between Hurst exponent and Roughness exponent appeared from system size dependent correlation function as was observed in Ref.…”
Section: Toppling Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The difference between Hurst exponent and Roughness exponent appeared from system size dependent correlation function as was observed in Ref. [41]. The critical exponent of toppling surfaces and that of the avalanche size capacity dimension can be found to be related as For the SSM, taking d B f = 1.64 and χ SSM = 0.42, D s,SSM should be 3.06 which is in agreement to the measured value of D s,SSM = 3.062 by the moment analysis of avalanche size.…”
Section: Toppling Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to characterize various geometrical properties of avalanche one needs to visualize the avalanche in a suitable parameter space. The values of the toppling number S φ [i] of an avalanche at different nodes of SWN define a surface called toppling surface [30] which not only serves as an important quantity to visualize an avalanche but also presents important scaling behaviour of several geometrical properties of the avalanche [31,32]. For an intermediate value of φ (SWN regime), the toppling surfaces of DSSM for both 1d and 2d are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Toppling Surface: Fragmentation Compactness and Fluctuationmentioning
confidence: 99%