2022
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossroads in Liver Transplantation: Is Artificial Intelligence the Key to Donor–Recipient Matching?

Abstract: Liver transplantation outcomes have improved in recent years. However, with the emergence of expanded donor criteria, tools to better assist donor–recipient matching have become necessary. Most of the currently proposed scores based on conventional biostatistics are not good classifiers of a problem that is considered “unbalanced.” In recent years, the implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine has experienced exponential growth. Deep learning, a branch of artificial intelligence, may be the answer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disparity between transplant candidates and available grafts is exacerbated by varying organ allocation policies, which range from prioritizing urgency (“sickest-first”) to favoring candidates with better clinical conditions based on “individual transplant benefit” and “population-based transplant benefit” principles. Consideration of risk factors, such as high-risk donors and recipients, may lead to avoidance in clinical practice, impacting high-risk, waitlisted transplant candidates negatively (Calleja Lozano et al, 2022 ). Traditional scoring systems, like logistic regression, have limitations in organ transplantation, assuming linear relationships, overlooking key variables, and struggling with unbalanced problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disparity between transplant candidates and available grafts is exacerbated by varying organ allocation policies, which range from prioritizing urgency (“sickest-first”) to favoring candidates with better clinical conditions based on “individual transplant benefit” and “population-based transplant benefit” principles. Consideration of risk factors, such as high-risk donors and recipients, may lead to avoidance in clinical practice, impacting high-risk, waitlisted transplant candidates negatively (Calleja Lozano et al, 2022 ). Traditional scoring systems, like logistic regression, have limitations in organ transplantation, assuming linear relationships, overlooking key variables, and struggling with unbalanced problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the utilization of AI in assessing grafts and matching donors with recipients has the potential to bring about significant advancements in the allocation system. The ultimate objective is to expedite transplantation procedures and improve overall outcomes [5,65]. Traditional models like SOFT or BAR scores often face challenges when accurately representing the complexities associated with donorrecipient matching [5].…”
Section: Liver Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advanced predictive algorithms of ML show great potential, suggesting a significant and positive effect on the process of organ allocation in the coming years. These algorithms are expected to greatly improve the accuracy of determining whether a recipient is matched with specific organ donors, surpassing current traditional allocation methods [8,65]. By utilizing a wide range of factors and examining their intricate relationships, this developing approach has the potential to enhance the entire process of allocating organs.…”
Section: Predictive Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI is a branch of computational science that studies computational models capable of performing activities similar to human ones based on two characteristics: behavior and reasoning. Machine learning is defined as a branch of AI that focuses on using data and algorithms to mimic how humans learn, and gradually improve the accuracy of the algorithms (43).…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence (Ai)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no current allocation system is capable of achieving an ideal match. This means that these systems are unable to identify the candidate on the waiting list with the highest probability of death, and identify, among all available grafts, the one with the highest probability of post-transplant success for this candidate (43).…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence (Ai)mentioning
confidence: 99%