2018
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crosstalk Between Mammalian Autophagy and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System

Abstract: Autophagy and the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) are the two major intracellular quality control and recycling mechanisms that are responsible for cellular homeostasis in eukaryotes. Ubiquitylation is utilized as a degradation signal by both systems, yet, different mechanisms are in play. The UPS is responsible for the degradation of short-lived proteins and soluble misfolded proteins whereas autophagy eliminates long-lived proteins, insoluble protein aggregates and even whole organelles (e.g., mitochondria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
291
0
17

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 371 publications
(412 reference statements)
6
291
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Aggregation-prone polyubiquitinated proteins are sometimes resistant to proteasomal degradation and must be recognized and removed by additional proteostasis response pathways, including the autophagy pathway (Ciechanover & Kwon, 2015, Cortes & La Spada, 2015, Kirkin, McEwan et al, 2009, Lim & Yue, 2015, Ryno, Wiseman et al, 2013. It is unclear how these different pathways are coordinated or how some substrates are preferred by one pathway over another (Kocaturk & Gozuacik, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregation-prone polyubiquitinated proteins are sometimes resistant to proteasomal degradation and must be recognized and removed by additional proteostasis response pathways, including the autophagy pathway (Ciechanover & Kwon, 2015, Cortes & La Spada, 2015, Kirkin, McEwan et al, 2009, Lim & Yue, 2015, Ryno, Wiseman et al, 2013. It is unclear how these different pathways are coordinated or how some substrates are preferred by one pathway over another (Kocaturk & Gozuacik, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the insoluble aggregates of GMPPB mutants completely colocalized with LC3‐II (the membrane type of LC3). In eukaryotes, autophagy–lysosome and ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) are two major quality control and recycling mechanisms responsible for cellular homeostasis . The UPS is responsible for the degradation of short‐lived proteins and soluble un/mis‐folded proteins, whereas autophagy‐lysosome eliminates long‐lived proteins, insoluble protein aggregates and degenerated organelles and intracellular parasites .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on previous efforts to isolate autophagic clearance from induction 40, 59, 69 , here we created a system with the pivotal capacity to assess native autophagic flux, thereby avoiding several basic confounds associated with overexpression of autophagy reporters 70, 71 . This is of particular relevance considering the intersection between autophagy and nutrient/energy sensing 42 , the role of microtubule associated transport in autophagosome maturation 48 , and the crosstalk between autophagy and the ubiquitin proteasome system 44 . Increasing protein dosage can also induce aberrant aggregation of misfolded proteins, and influence the likelihood of protein phase separation 70, 72 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burdening the cell with non-physiological concentrations of substrate might artificially prolong flux estimates, or conversely enhance flux via regulatory feedback mechanisms. Moreover, because autophagy regulation is intricately tied to amino acid availability 42, 43 and the ubiquitin proteasome system 44 , any perturbations to these pathways brought on by protein overexpression may further confound measurements of flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%