2003
DOI: 10.1029/2002rs002672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crosswind ocean radar backscatter and two‐scale scattering model at low grazing angles

Abstract: [1] A two-scale model of rough surface in a crosswind ocean radar illumination is considered. Model characteristics such as polarization and azimuthal dependence are illustrated through numerical calculations. Predictions of the model are compared with rare field measurements made in a crosswind environment. Measurements were obtained at a 2°grazing angle. These data, collected by X-and Ka-band (9.3 and 34.6 GHz) radars under crosswind during the 1995 Coastal Ocean Probing Experiment (COPE) off the Oregon Coas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, this depolarization mechanism is behind the CM calculations [10]- [12] (see also [37] where the CM calculations of the backscatter depolarized component are performed for the case of highly steep sea surface facets). However, there is also an additional second-order Bragg scattering depolarization mechanism which should be taken into account at least for moderately rough seas.…”
Section: Normalized Bistatic Scattering Cross Section In the Ssa2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, this depolarization mechanism is behind the CM calculations [10]- [12] (see also [37] where the CM calculations of the backscatter depolarized component are performed for the case of highly steep sea surface facets). However, there is also an additional second-order Bragg scattering depolarization mechanism which should be taken into account at least for moderately rough seas.…”
Section: Normalized Bistatic Scattering Cross Section In the Ssa2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is an abundant literature on C, Ku, and X-band radar backscattering from wind-generated water surface waves in tank or oceanic conditions, the use of radar millimeter wavelength range (Ka band) has been far less documented. We found it limited to a few studies performed in airborne [Masuko et al, 1986;Nekrasov and Hoogeboom, 2005;Tanelli et al, 2006;Walsh et al, 1998;Vandemark et al, 2004;Walsh et al, 2008;Fjortoft et al, 2014], coastal [Long, 2001;Dyer et al, 1974;Smirnov et al, 2003], and wind-wave tank [Giovanangeli et al, 1991;Keller et al, 1995;Gade et al, 1998;Plant et al, 1999Plant et al, , 2004Ermakov et al, 2010] conditions. These studies have unveiled the specificity of Ka-band radar return in terms of backscattering cross section as well as Doppler signature when compared to lower microwave bands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the real rough sea surface, the roughness parallel to the wind direction is larger than the one perpendicular to it, so we only need to consider the curvature effect of large-scale roughness along the wind direction on the radar return. Let downwind direction be x-axis, the curvature radius R x [19] in the modified curvature factors is shown as…”
Section: Four Corrections To the Ocean Surface Backscatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%