2019
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w8-331-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowd4ems: A Crowdsourcing Platform for Gathering And Geolocating Social Media Content in Disaster Response

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Increase in access to mobile phone devices and social media networks has changed the way people report and respond to disasters. Community-driven initiatives such as Stand By Task Force (SBTF) or GISCorps have shown great potential by crowdsourcing the acquisition, analysis, and geolocation of social media data for disaster responders. These initiatives face two main challenges: (1) most of social media content such as photos and videos are not geolocated, thus p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we contacted a group of ten experts with prior knowledge of disaster response and crisis data. We presented the set of 907 images as tasks to the experts via the Crowd4EMS platform [32]. Crowd4EMS combines automatic methods for gathering information from social media and crowdsourcing techniques, in order to manage and aggregate volunteers' contributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we contacted a group of ten experts with prior knowledge of disaster response and crisis data. We presented the set of 907 images as tasks to the experts via the Crowd4EMS platform [32]. Crowd4EMS combines automatic methods for gathering information from social media and crowdsourcing techniques, in order to manage and aggregate volunteers' contributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in Section 3.5, crowdsourcing was performed using three different groups of citizens to annotate the relevant images and the severity of damage seen in the photos by humans compared to the AIDR. Specifically, to obtain a ground truth for the labels, we first worked with ten disaster experts and configured a redundancy of 3 for annotations on the Crowd4EMS platform [39], a precursor of CSPB. We then referred to a group of 50 volunteers on Crowd4EMS with a redundancy of 3.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media analysis, including both an automatic analysis of images contained in posts and the collaboration of human computing, has been discussed by several authors in the literature, for example, [2,21,39]. For automatic analysis of images, many recent approaches are based on AI and in particular neural networks, for example, [24,32,35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Availability of a committed crowd within the given time [33] and vast volumes of data [34] is often a challenge and a limiting factor for crowdsourcing initiatives. While federating existing communities [35] can ensure commitment, the volume of tasks could hinder the community in sustaining the interest. Volunteer crowdsourcing initiatives are not incentivized and are often motivated by factors including, but not limited to altruism, peer-indulgence, curiosity, fun and in some cases because of the organization that conducts the initiative.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%