2009
DOI: 10.1257/pol.1.2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowded Colleges and College Crowd-Out: The Impact of Public Subsidies on the Two-Year College Market

Abstract: This study assesses the impact of an increase in funding for public community colleges on the market for two-year college education, considering both the effect on community college enrollments and on the number of proprietary schools in a market. I draw on a new administrative dataset of for-profit colleges in California and votes on local community college bond referenda to implement a unique regression discontinuity design. The results suggest that bond passage diverts students from the private to the publi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
83
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
83
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These models can overwhelm our statistical power due to the state-level analysis over just 11 years of data in each case. Upon inspection, there is little variation in for-profit market share once we impose statespecific trends, which coincides with other work suggesting that proprietary institutions are selfpropagating once they draw a critical mass of students to fund their existence (Cellini, 2009). …”
Section: Robustness I State-specific Time Trendssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models can overwhelm our statistical power due to the state-level analysis over just 11 years of data in each case. Upon inspection, there is little variation in for-profit market share once we impose statespecific trends, which coincides with other work suggesting that proprietary institutions are selfpropagating once they draw a critical mass of students to fund their existence (Cellini, 2009). …”
Section: Robustness I State-specific Time Trendssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…There is existing evidence that for-profits schools compete with public sector community colleges for students, with studies focusing separately on the supply and demand sides of the market (Cellini, 2009;Chung, 2012). In addition, a separate strand of research has evinced substantially decreases in attendance rates brought about by larger-than-usual cohorts and prices in the public sector (Bound and Turner, 2007;Fortin, 2005).…”
Section: B How Public Funding Could Influence Enrollment Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be the case that students are unaware of the options available at local community colleges (Cellini, 2009) and we cannot rule out that aggressive recruiters in the private sector might mislead students into believing that the earnings gains will be higher than in the public sector (United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2010). On the other hand, students may simply value other attributes of for-profit colleges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellini (2009) shows that forprofits and community colleges compete for students: when funding for community colleges increases, for-profit colleges exit the market. Similarly, Chung (2012) finds that community college tuition positively impacts the probability of attending a for-profit college.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation