2016
DOI: 10.1145/2939376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourced Mobile Data Transfer with Delay Bound

Abstract: In this article, we design a crowdsourcing system, CrowdMAC, where mobile devices form a local community or marketplace to share network access and transfer data for each other. CrowdMAC enables (i) mobile clients to select and exploit multiple mobile hotspots in its vicinity for data transfer and (ii) mobile hotspots to open their cellular connectivity to admit/serve delay-bounded requests from mobile users for a fee. The evaluations of CrowdMAC indicate that (i) mobile clients can tune preferred trade-offs b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other common criteria such as device resource/status may be further considered when selecting the mainstay. Still, our evaluation does not analyze the power consumption due to D2D communication, as we rely on the results of previous studies that show that D2D networking is cheaper than cellular networking [2,5,34]. It is part of our future work to further investigate the overall effectiveness of IAM in terms of resource efficiency vs data accuracy, compared to the centralized approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other common criteria such as device resource/status may be further considered when selecting the mainstay. Still, our evaluation does not analyze the power consumption due to D2D communication, as we rely on the results of previous studies that show that D2D networking is cheaper than cellular networking [2,5,34]. It is part of our future work to further investigate the overall effectiveness of IAM in terms of resource efficiency vs data accuracy, compared to the centralized approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, P2P wireless ad hoc network technology (e.g., Wi-Fi Direct) enables the discovery of nearby mobile devices and the exchange of data between peers, making the collaboration possible [6,20]. Some crowdsensing systems already exploit the P2P collaboration of crowdsensors as they meet [5,34,39]. However, the collaboration primarily deals with handling the relay of data, while deployed static edge servers are in charge of the distributed data aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crowdsourced wireless community networks which are composed of shared Wi-Fi APs were investigated in [14]- [16] to alleviate the limited coverage problem of Wi-Fi APs. UPN mechanisms have been investigated to utilize the power of wide-spread movable terminals [17]. A reimbursing scheme was proposed in [18] for enabling a mobile virtual network operator to offer free data quota as incentives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such commoditization is often accompanied by default admin accounts, guest accounts, default disabled security settings, etc, that result in little to no security for the device and the information. While both fixed and mobile hotspots [6] are in use, in this paper, we specifically focus on static hotspots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%