2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2018.2880180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing and Sensing for Indoor Localization in IoT: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method proposed in this work could be extended using crowdsourcing [16], as we did previously to detect a disabled AP [15]. The previously introduced methods allow the system to limit rebuilding frequency by waiting for a significant number of raised alarms to recreate the localisation model.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed in this work could be extended using crowdsourcing [16], as we did previously to detect a disabled AP [15]. The previously introduced methods allow the system to limit rebuilding frequency by waiting for a significant number of raised alarms to recreate the localisation model.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a classification proposed by Lashkari et al [5] current indoor positioning systems can be grouped in two categories:  crowdsourcingsystems that imply an explicit interaction with the user, the information being harvested directly from the users  crowdsensingsystems that require implicit user interaction, where the data is collected from sensors rather than the users Besides the more extensive used techniques in indoor location that rely on external deployed equipment and wireless technologies to compose proximity based systems like WiFi, Zigbee, Bluetooth, acoustic signals, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) or Ultra-wideband (UWB), this paper will focus more on those approaches that use software and common devices in detriment of dedicated hardware components. Comprehensive literature review of most important indoor location techniques that fall in the spectrum of the former category, like Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), Angle of Arrival (AoA), Phase of Arrival (PoA), Time of Flight (ToF), Return Time of Flight (RToF), Line of Sight (LoS), might be found in Zafara et al [6], Magdid et al [7], Ferreira et al [8] and Xiao et al [9].…”
Section: Current Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al [25] propose a crowdsourcing and multisource fusion-based fingerprint sensing where motion sensors are used to construct the radio map by volunteers and pedestrian dead reckoning based on motion sensors equipped in smartphones is used for positioning. Lashkari et al [26] study the level of user contribution in available crowd-powered techniques and propose a classification for crowd-powered indoor localization solutions to clarify which crowds-based approach is utilized in each indoor localization solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%