2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2014.6982289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing based subjective quality assessment of adaptive video streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, users need to be physically present in the laboratory to perform the test [46]. On the other hand, crowdsourcing experiments allow an investigator to get opinions from a vast variety of subjects; in a time-flexible, test-data size scalable, and swift manner [35]. A summary of the results of both experiments is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, users need to be physically present in the laboratory to perform the test [46]. On the other hand, crowdsourcing experiments allow an investigator to get opinions from a vast variety of subjects; in a time-flexible, test-data size scalable, and swift manner [35]. A summary of the results of both experiments is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] various improvements for implementing subjective crowdsourcing experiments are proposed, so-called momento methods that increase the reliability and execution time of the crowdsourcing campaign. This work builds on our previous work [35], where the initial results from the crowdsourcing experiment are presented.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 (5) confirm that this is a very efficient tool for feature selection, while producing accurate quality estimations through the use of sparse models, at the same time. As a baseline, ridge regression [16][17][18] is used, which requires a much larger number of features, as compared to LASSO for making MOS estimations, even after a feature selection preprocessing.…”
Section: Goals Of the Articlementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Crowdsourcing-based subjective VQA is an emerging technique, where test material is transferred to the viewer's premises through the Internet and the quality scores are collected through a loosely controlled environment. 5 However, subjective VQA is rather tedious, timeconsuming, and impractical to be incorporated in many realtime applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%