2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourcing ideas: Involving ordinary users in the ideation phase of new product development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
136
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
136
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also referred to as citizen science and citizen social science (e.g., Procter et al, 2013; also see https://scistarter.com/), this participatory process has recently gained in popularity due to the increasing volume of scientific data and limited centralized support to efficiently process the data (Ranard et al, 2014). Although extensively used in the biomedical domain as a way to harness the computational power of many people to process large-scale biomedical data-such as to support genome sequence analysis (Kawrykow, Roumanis, Kam & Kwak, 2012;Rallapalli et al, 2015) and protein structure prediction (Cooper et al, 2010)-it is also now being used as a field-based research methodology in a wide range of disciplines; for example crowdsourcing approaches are used to classify distant galaxies (Lintott et al, 2008; also see https://www.galaxyzoo.org/), create geographic digital maps (Whitmeyer & De Paor, 2014), collect more representative data in forensic psychology research (Baker, Fox & Wingrove, 2016), tackle complex architectural design needs (Newton & Backhouse, 2013), validate assessment of interventions for speech disorders (Byun, Halpin & Szeredi, 2015), and engage in new product development (Schemmann, Hermann, Chappin & Heimeriks, 2016). The growing need for crowdsourcing in research and development has led to social networked spaces such as the Amazon Mechanical Turk (https://www.mturk.com/), CloudFactory (https://www.cloudfactory.com/), CrowdFlower (https://www.crowdflower.com/), and clickworker (https://www.clickworker.com/)-online, distributed sources of available workers.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also referred to as citizen science and citizen social science (e.g., Procter et al, 2013; also see https://scistarter.com/), this participatory process has recently gained in popularity due to the increasing volume of scientific data and limited centralized support to efficiently process the data (Ranard et al, 2014). Although extensively used in the biomedical domain as a way to harness the computational power of many people to process large-scale biomedical data-such as to support genome sequence analysis (Kawrykow, Roumanis, Kam & Kwak, 2012;Rallapalli et al, 2015) and protein structure prediction (Cooper et al, 2010)-it is also now being used as a field-based research methodology in a wide range of disciplines; for example crowdsourcing approaches are used to classify distant galaxies (Lintott et al, 2008; also see https://www.galaxyzoo.org/), create geographic digital maps (Whitmeyer & De Paor, 2014), collect more representative data in forensic psychology research (Baker, Fox & Wingrove, 2016), tackle complex architectural design needs (Newton & Backhouse, 2013), validate assessment of interventions for speech disorders (Byun, Halpin & Szeredi, 2015), and engage in new product development (Schemmann, Hermann, Chappin & Heimeriks, 2016). The growing need for crowdsourcing in research and development has led to social networked spaces such as the Amazon Mechanical Turk (https://www.mturk.com/), CloudFactory (https://www.cloudfactory.com/), CrowdFlower (https://www.crowdflower.com/), and clickworker (https://www.clickworker.com/)-online, distributed sources of available workers.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies imply that paying attention to peers' ideas is beneficial (Bayus, 2013;Schemmann et al, 2016), but it is unclear what kind of ideas should be attended to. Some studies imply that paying attention to peers' ideas is beneficial (Bayus, 2013;Schemmann et al, 2016), but it is unclear what kind of ideas should be attended to.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that this is an important research gap because original ideas are often the desired outcome of crowdsourcing innovation projects (Schemmann et al, 2016). In particular, there is little research on the effect of exposure to original ideas in crowdsourcing ideation.…”
Section: However It Is Less Clear What Kind Of Ideas Should Be Attenmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neste sentido, ao conhecer-se que existem muitas plataformas on-line, disponíveis em todo o mundo, que possibilitam transformar pessoas em editores de ideias e soluções, independente de sua formação e experiência (SCHEMMANN et al, 2016), o presente estudo tem como objeto de averiguação a IDEO, empresa de reconhecimento mundial que instituiu uma plataforma de inovação aberta denominada OpenIDEO.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified