Crowdsourcing to expand HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: A closed cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundHIV testing rates are suboptimal among at-risk men. Crowdsourcing may be a useful tool for designing innovative, community-based HIV testing strategies to increase HIV testing. The purpose of this study was to use a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effect of a crowdsourced HIV intervention on HIV testing uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM) in eight Chinese cities.Methods and findingsAn HIV testing intervention was developed through a national image contest, a regional strategy designathon, and local message contests. The final intervention included a multimedia HIV testing campaign, an online HIV testing service, and local testing promotion campaigns tailored for MSM. This intervention was evaluated using a closed cohort stepped wedge cluster RCT in eight Chinese cities (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, and Jiangmen in Guangdong province; Jinan, Qingdao, Yantai, and Jining in Shandong province) from August 2016 to August 2017. MSM were recruited through Blued, a social networking mobile application for MSM, from July 29 to August 21 of 2016. The primary outcome was self-reported HIV testing in the past 3 months. Secondary outcomes included HIV self-testing, facility-based HIV testing, condom use, and syphilis testing. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to analyze primary and secondary outcomes. We enrolled a total of 1,381 MSM. Most were ≤30 years old (82%), unmarried (86%), and had a college degree or higher (65%). The proportion of individuals receiving an HIV test during the intervention periods within a city was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2–15.5) greater than during the control periods. In addition, the intention-to-treat analysis showed a higher probability of receiving an HIV test during the intervention periods as compared to the control periods (estimated risk ratio [RR] = 1.43, 95% CI 1.19–1.73). The intervention also increased HIV self-testing (RR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.50–2.38). There was no effect on facility-based HIV testing (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.79–1.26), condom use (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.86–1.17), or syphilis testing (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.70–1.21). A total of 48.6% (593/1,219) of participants reported that they received HIV self-testing. Among men who received two HIV tests, 32 individuals seroconverted during the 1-year study period. Study limitations include the use of self-reported HIV testing data among a subset of men and non-completion of the final survey by 23% of participants. Our study population was a young online group in urban China and the relevance of our findings to other populations will require further investigation.ConclusionsIn this setting, crowdsourcing was effective for developing and strengthening community-based HIV testing services for MSM. Crowdsourced interventions may be an important tool for the scale-up of HIV testing services among MSM in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796963

Maximizing Digital Interventions for Youth in the Midst of Covid-19: Lessons from the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV Interventions

“…The majority of iTech's studies focus on improving the prevention continuum-including promoting home-based HIV testing as part of the digital intervention [20][21][22]. Within three iTech interventions (MyChoices, LYNX and We Prevent) participants can request home-based HIV/STI test kits via study app.…”

Recalling, Sharing and Participating in a Social Media Intervention Promoting HIV Testing: A Longitudinal Analysis of HIV Testing Among MSM in China

“…The lack of an association between participating in online activities and HIV testing may be related to a lack of online intentions being effectively translated into offline behaviors. In addition, subgroups without previous HIV testing may have been particularly likely to test as part of the intervention period [34]. Future studies on social media interventions should provide visual and textual information, engage local communities, and evaluate participant recall.…”

“…This study is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected as part of a randomized controlled trial that is described in detail elsewhere [34]. The stepped wedge randomized controlled trial collected data from MSM over a 12-month period starting in July 2016 in eight Chinese cities: four cities in Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai, and Jiangmen) and four cities in Shandong Province (Jinan, Qingdao, Yantai, and Jining).…”

“…The intervention's social media components included six images or texts that promoted HIV testing, a web link containing information on local HIV testing sites, and a web link containing information on an online local community contest to promote HIV testing. The intervention materials were developed using a series of crowdsourcing contests [34]. The purpose of these materials was to promote HIV testing, with dissemination through social media [35].…”

Effect of a web drama video series on HIV and other sexually transmitted infection testing among gay, bisexual and queer men: study protocol for a community-based, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Singapore: the People Like Us (PLU) Evaluation Study

“…21 Several studies also assessed the efficacy of crowdsourced videos on HIV testing, and largely found that they were non-inferior to regular health marketing campaigns, 17 or only had a positive effect on HIV testing rates through the use of home-based self-testing kits, but not facility-based HIV/STI testing. 22 There are, however, several limitations in the context of reach and feasibility for such interventions. For example, reminder-based and peer education-based interventions require existing health systems that can support such interventions, which may not be feasible in most settings that do not have such services, or where GBQ male-specific clinical services are unavailable due to the criminalisation of sex between men.…”