2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crown size-growth relationships of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) are driven by the interplay of disturbance intensity and inter-specific competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crown profile, which is a useful predictor for crown size, has attracted the most attention as it exhibits a close relationship between species diversity and ecosystem stability [1][2][3]. The crown profile of a tree is generally characterized by simple regular geometrical shapes [4,5] or mathematical equations [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crown profile, which is a useful predictor for crown size, has attracted the most attention as it exhibits a close relationship between species diversity and ecosystem stability [1][2][3]. The crown profile of a tree is generally characterized by simple regular geometrical shapes [4,5] or mathematical equations [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If spatially detailed information on the crown dimensions is available from TLS, such as CRmeanTLS calculated from 360 measurements, estimations of CSATLS that rely on simple geometric models seem to offer no advantages. Analyzing the same sites considered in our study, Fichtner et al (2013) showed that tree growth is related to CSA (R²>0.37-0.63), though a tree crown model developed only for the sun-exposed crown was mistakenly applied to the whole crown, thereby ignoring the usually assumed differences in shape between the sunexposed and the shaded part, as presented here and elsewhere (Pretzsch et al 2002, Pretzsch 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Since crown dimensions of such trees are overestimated, their diameter growth may mistakenly be interpreted as lower than expected, which may lead to misinterpretations. In their study at the same sites, Fichtner et al (2013) concluded that the growth efficiency of beech trees in managed forests, which had been released from competition and which were characterized by large crowns, was lower than that of trees with shallow crowns in an unmanaged stand. Actually, no difference in mean growth efficiency (basal area increment per m 2 crown projection area) between managed and unmanaged trees exists if the regression equation in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such studies with multitemporal point cloud data analyses are rare, mainly focusing on standard tree dendrometrics or wood volume estimations (Liang et al., 2012; Srinivasan et al., 2014). Our new method is, thus, a very promising approach which should lead to important advances in several aspects of forest ecological research, such as investigations on crown growth, morphology and plasticity (Longuetaud, Piboule, Wernsdörfer, & Collet, 2013; Schröter, Härdtle, & von Oheimb, 2012), canopy structures and canopy packing (Jucker, Bouriaud, Coomes, & Baltzer, 2015; Morin, 2015; Pretzsch, 2014), crown‐related tree interactions and competition (Fichtner, Sturm, Rickert, von Oheimb, & Härdtle, 2013; Lang et al., 2012; Potvin & Dutilleul, 2009; Thorpe, Astrup, Trowbridge, & Coates, 2010), and niche differentiation and spatial complementarity (Ishii & Asano, 2010; Sapijanskas, Paquette, Potvin, Kunert, & Loreau, 2014; Williams, Paquette, Cavender‐Bares, Messier, & Reich, 2017), including changes over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%