2012
DOI: 10.2298/abs1202605k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crown structure of Picea omorika trees in the plantation

Abstract: The study was carried out in Serbian spruce (Picea omorika Panč/Purkynĕ) plantations in the western Serbia. The paper presents results of the analysis of crown development. The following elements were analyzed: total tree height, height of the crown base, absolute and relative crown length, maximal crown diameter, coefficient of crown spreading and degree of crown girth. We discuss approaches to the modeling of tree crown growth and development, growing under favorable environmental and stand conditions,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All seedlings were classified into three height categories relevant to neighboring seedlings in each plot, which, in a similar fashion, is often applied to estimate competition in stands (see for example, Krstic et al 2012). Since the seedlings were in a very early competition stage during which direct competition played no role or a subordinate role, the following terms were applied: 'accelerated growth' instead of 'dominant'; relatively 'average growth' instead of 'codominant'; and, 'retarded growth' instead of 'suppressed'.…”
Section: Assessment Of Relative Height Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All seedlings were classified into three height categories relevant to neighboring seedlings in each plot, which, in a similar fashion, is often applied to estimate competition in stands (see for example, Krstic et al 2012). Since the seedlings were in a very early competition stage during which direct competition played no role or a subordinate role, the following terms were applied: 'accelerated growth' instead of 'dominant'; relatively 'average growth' instead of 'codominant'; and, 'retarded growth' instead of 'suppressed'.…”
Section: Assessment Of Relative Height Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%