2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
56
6
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
56
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the survival rate from overall fracture in ETT restored with full‐coverage crowns was higher than those restored with resin composite restorations. The outcome was consistent with the results of other studies that showed that ETT with a significant loss of tooth structure should be restored with crowns …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the survival rate from overall fracture in ETT restored with full‐coverage crowns was higher than those restored with resin composite restorations. The outcome was consistent with the results of other studies that showed that ETT with a significant loss of tooth structure should be restored with crowns …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…ETT are weakened by the loss of tooth structure from dental caries, tooth fracture, or pre‐existing restoration, but not from endodontic procedures . With a significant loss of tooth structure, ETT should receive a cuspal‐coverage restoration to prevent unrestorable fracture . ETT restored with crowns within 4 months had a significantly higher survival rate than ETT with delayed restoration placement …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, dental composites are most often the material of choice in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth 6) . Also, finishing the therapy in one session is considerably more comfortable for the patient 18) . Further, the finantial aspect plays a very important role in the choice of reconstruction, and longer chair time or laboratory procedures elevate the costs of the intervention 19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the available in vivo, in vitro and FEA literature on the survival and success of postendodontic restorations investigates the classical crown restoration, so the results cannot be fully comparable to the present study. However, certain in vivo studies showed equally good or better performance of direct composite restorations as compared to metalocramic crowns after a 5 and 9-year follow-up, respectivelly 18,22) . Cusp reduction was the most influential factor in the maximum von Mises stress value changes in the enamel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite that, the association of RelyX Arc and Single Bond is recommended by the manufactures, and its application on GFP cementation is supported by a clinical study [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%