2010
DOI: 10.4314/tjas.v1i2.49585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crude protein requirement of growing cockerels by diet dilution technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 shows the effects of the graded CP levels, as per the two methods, on the response criteria measured. As observed in the earlier studies (Salami & Boorman, 1999;Salami, personal communication), the response criteria were improved significantly as the CP level increased up to 18 per cent CP level. Beyond this level, performance in weight gain, feed conversion ratio and protein efficiency ratio tended to deteriorate, indicating that protein in excess of requirement was harmful to the birds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 4 shows the effects of the graded CP levels, as per the two methods, on the response criteria measured. As observed in the earlier studies (Salami & Boorman, 1999;Salami, personal communication), the response criteria were improved significantly as the CP level increased up to 18 per cent CP level. Beyond this level, performance in weight gain, feed conversion ratio and protein efficiency ratio tended to deteriorate, indicating that protein in excess of requirement was harmful to the birds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, Diets B and F, which contained 18 per cent CP, satisfied the cockerel finishers' requirement. This dietary CP level also minimizes the feed cost per unit of weight gain as in antecedent reports; for example, Salami & Boorman (1999). The similarity in the response pattern of cockerels to treatment diets produced by both methods confirms that they are equally good in predicting the CP requirements of the finishing cockerels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation