2019
DOI: 10.3221/igf-esis.51.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crumbling of Amatrice clock tower during 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence: Advanced numerical insights

Abstract: The dynamic behaviour and the seismic vulnerability of the ancient civic clock tower of Amatrice, dramatically damaged by the last shocks sequence of 2016 that occurred in Central Italy, is studied in this paper by means of advanced 3D numerical analyses with the Non-Smooth Contact Dynamics Method (NSCD). Thus, a discontinuous approach was used to assess the dynamic properties and the vulnerability of the masonry structure, through large displacements regulated by the Signorini's law, concerning the impenetrab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Physical and hysteretic damping were implemented, within an implicit time-integration scheme. The non-smooth contact dynamics method was applied to account for masonry fragmentation of monumental constructions, 39 resorting to an implicit integration scheme and to friction alone for energy dissipation. In this section, two modelling approaches are proposed to simulate the dynamic behaviour of the wall both a priori, that is before the tests, and a posteriori, relying on a wealth of information collected during the experiments and on a more detailed description of geometry and boundary conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Physical and hysteretic damping were implemented, within an implicit time-integration scheme. The non-smooth contact dynamics method was applied to account for masonry fragmentation of monumental constructions, 39 resorting to an implicit integration scheme and to friction alone for energy dissipation. In this section, two modelling approaches are proposed to simulate the dynamic behaviour of the wall both a priori, that is before the tests, and a posteriori, relying on a wealth of information collected during the experiments and on a more detailed description of geometry and boundary conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for nonlinear dynamic analyses, there are several numerical methods that allow to evaluate the structural response employing FEM with different constitutive relationships (e.g., Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP), Total strain-based crack (TSC)), discontinuous methods (e.g., Non-Smooth Contact Dynamics (NSCD), Discrete Element Method (DEM)) (Clementi et al 2019;Clementi 2021;Ferrante et al 2021) and Discrete Macro-Element Modeling (DMEM) (Chácara et al 2019). One of the better performing approaches appears to be the nonlinear dynamic analysis of the walls considered as rocking rigid blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrete element models -or restricting the family of the approaches proposed, Distinct Element Methods DEMs-(as for instance those presented in [36]- [44] without being exhaustive) where masonry is modelled with rigid or elastic blocks and all non-linearity is lumped on joints typically assumed with a cohesive frictional behaviour [43][44]. Such approach is conceived mainly for Non Linear Dynamic Analyses NLDAs [45]- [47] but it can be adapted also to static non linear analyses, or in presence of foundation settlements, albeit requiring typically huge computational efforts. There are obviously other important drawbacks that cannot be summarized in few words in this introduction, but it is interesting to point out how they have recently inspired the implementation of FEM combined with DEM for large scale computations (see for instance [48]- [49]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%