2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crushing response of square aluminium tubes filled with polyurethane foam and aluminium honeycomb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al (2017) designed the energy-absorbing structure of a crashworthy railway vehicle by combining the characteristics of thin-walled metal structures and aluminium honeycomb structures, and they discussed the safe velocity standard for rail vehicle collisions, which was improved from 25 km/h to 45 km/h by adopting a combined energy-absorbing structure. Hussein et al (2017) Basically, the main challenge in the crashworthiness design and development of subway vehicles is how to find the optimal design of an EAS that can satisfy best the crashworthiness requirements. Optimisation of structural crashworthiness using surrogate models and intelligent algorithms is considered as a research focus in vehicle engineering (Fazilati and Alisadeghi 2016;Yin et al 2013;Forsberg and Nilsson 2005;Yin et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al (2017) designed the energy-absorbing structure of a crashworthy railway vehicle by combining the characteristics of thin-walled metal structures and aluminium honeycomb structures, and they discussed the safe velocity standard for rail vehicle collisions, which was improved from 25 km/h to 45 km/h by adopting a combined energy-absorbing structure. Hussein et al (2017) Basically, the main challenge in the crashworthiness design and development of subway vehicles is how to find the optimal design of an EAS that can satisfy best the crashworthiness requirements. Optimisation of structural crashworthiness using surrogate models and intelligent algorithms is considered as a research focus in vehicle engineering (Fazilati and Alisadeghi 2016;Yin et al 2013;Forsberg and Nilsson 2005;Yin et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the foam helps to support the energy absorption capability of the structure [22]. It was supported by a study conducted by Hussien et al that found the specific energy absorption of foam-filled structure was higher compared to hollow one [1]. Similar results gained by Yan et al in the study on lateral crushing of polyurethane foam-filled natural flax fabric reinforced epoxy composite tubes [23].…”
Section: Optimization Of Foam-filled Square Thin-walled Aluminium Strmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Part 2 describes the design and experimental procedure, consists of specimen preparation and optimization method of foam-filled structure under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Later, part 3 presents and discusses the experimental results of the structures together with the optimization results and finally the conclusion was describing in part 4 The energy absorption capability must be high and initial peak force should be sufficiently low and the fluctuation should be in controlled manner to avoid the impact from causing injury to the passenger [1]. Uma Devi et al have conducted a simulation study to find an optimum cross sectional shape of a crash box to ensure high capability for energy absorption without crash beads [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal and composite honeycomb structures were introduced as a filling core in many studies [199], [226], [227]. A honeycomb-filled tube exhibited improved crashworthiness performance and higher energy absorption measurements than a hollow tube under axial loading [199], [226].…”
Section: Honeycomb Fillermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the fact that the honeycomb has a lower density than aluminium foam for the same volume and therefore it offers higher strength to weight ratio than aluminium foam. Hussein et al [226], who conducted an experimental investigation on the axial crushing of square aluminium tubes filled with polyurethane foam and/or aluminium honeycomb, founded that a polyurethane foam-filled tube yields higher energy absorption measurements than a honeycomb-filled tube and thus it was concluded that polyurethane foam core is more effective than honeycomb filling.…”
Section: Honeycomb Fillermentioning
confidence: 99%