2007
DOI: 10.1029/2006jb004681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crust‐mantle boundary in the central Fennoscandian shield: Constraints from wide‐angle P and S wave velocity models and new results of reflection profiling in Finland

Abstract: [1] Our paper presents analysis of the crust-mantle boundary in the central Fennoscandian shield based on new P and S wave two-dimensional velocity models of the SVEKA'81, SVEKA'91 and FENNIA wide-angle reflection and refraction profiles and on results of a new seismic reflection experiment in Finland (Finnish Reflection Experiment (FIRE)). In this area, the crust is extremely thick (50-60 km), and the Moho boundary is difficult to detect using methods based on interpretation of P waves only (near vertical pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing data on experimentally studied lower crustal and mantle composition and 3-D structure derived from xenolith data, lithospheric thermal models Hieronymus et al, 2007) and seismic studies (Bruneton et al, 2004;Sandoval et al, 2004;Yliniemi et al, 2004;Hjelt et al, 2006;Pedersen et al, 2006;Plomerova et al, 2006;Janik et al, 2007;Olsson et al, 2007) should be utilized for forward rheological modelling of the lithosphere and for testing of dynamic uplift models. The presence and volume of fluids in the upper mantle and the influence of fluids on the mantle rheology is an open question.…”
Section: Evidence From Geophysical Observations Of Lithosphere Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing data on experimentally studied lower crustal and mantle composition and 3-D structure derived from xenolith data, lithospheric thermal models Hieronymus et al, 2007) and seismic studies (Bruneton et al, 2004;Sandoval et al, 2004;Yliniemi et al, 2004;Hjelt et al, 2006;Pedersen et al, 2006;Plomerova et al, 2006;Janik et al, 2007;Olsson et al, 2007) should be utilized for forward rheological modelling of the lithosphere and for testing of dynamic uplift models. The presence and volume of fluids in the upper mantle and the influence of fluids on the mantle rheology is an open question.…”
Section: Evidence From Geophysical Observations Of Lithosphere Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing data on experimentally studied lower crustal and mantle composition and 3-D structure derived from xenolith data, lithospheric thermal models Hieronymus et al, 2007) and seismic studies (Bruneton et al, 2004;Sandoval et al, 2004;Yliniemi et al, 2004;Hjelt et al, 2006;Pedersen et al, 2006;Plomerova et al, 2006;Gregersen et al, 2006;Janik et al, 2007;Olsson et al, 2007) should be utilized for forward rheological modelling of the lithosphere and for testing of dynamic uplift models. The presence and volume of fluids in the upper mantle and the influence of fluids on the mantle rheology is an open question.…”
Section: Evidence From Geophysical Observations Of Lithosphere Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lithosphere structure of the central part of the Shield has been studied since 1980s and 1990s by controlled‐source deep seismic sounding profiles BALTIC, SVEKA'81, SVEKA'91, FENNIA, BABEL (Luosto et al 1984, 1990, 1994; Grad & Luosto 1987; BABEL Working Group 1990, 1993a,b; Sharov 1991; Yliniemi 1991; FENNIA Working Group 1998; Heikkinen & Luosto 2000). In 2001–2003 a new reflection seismic survey Finnish Reflection Experiment (FIRE), comprised four reflection seismic transects of total length of 2104 km (Kukkonen et al 2006; Janik et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Musacchio et al (1997) and Janik et al (2007) demonstrated how analysis of S ‐wave velocities and V P / V S ratio in the crust and upper mantle can be used to infer compositional variations in the crust and to distinguish different types of crust–mantle transitions. However, their studies are limited to 2‐D models only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%