2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crust-mantle structure and lithospheric destruction of the oldest craton in the Indian shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all the above proposed models are entirely based on geochronological and other geological studies (stratigraphic correlation, sedimentological information, magmatism, deformation, and metamorphism) and do not include the geophysical components. Existing geophysical studies have attempted to map the gross lithospheric structure of the Eastern Indian Shield (EIS) and do not specifically describe the crustal evolution of the NSMB (Bhattacharya & Shalivahan, 2002; Das et al, 2019; Kayal, Srivastava, Kumar, Chatterjee, & Khan, 2011; Mandal, 2017, 2019; Mandal et al, 2021; Mandal & Biswas, 2016; Singh, Kumar, Rao, & Tiwari, 2021; Singh, Kumar, & Zeyen, 2015; Vasanthi et al, 2021). A detailed summary of results obtained from previous studies of the EIS is provided in Section 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, all the above proposed models are entirely based on geochronological and other geological studies (stratigraphic correlation, sedimentological information, magmatism, deformation, and metamorphism) and do not include the geophysical components. Existing geophysical studies have attempted to map the gross lithospheric structure of the Eastern Indian Shield (EIS) and do not specifically describe the crustal evolution of the NSMB (Bhattacharya & Shalivahan, 2002; Das et al, 2019; Kayal, Srivastava, Kumar, Chatterjee, & Khan, 2011; Mandal, 2017, 2019; Mandal et al, 2021; Mandal & Biswas, 2016; Singh, Kumar, Rao, & Tiwari, 2021; Singh, Kumar, & Zeyen, 2015; Vasanthi et al, 2021). A detailed summary of results obtained from previous studies of the EIS is provided in Section 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, several geophysical investigations were carried out to study the crustal structure of the EIS (Bhattacharya & Shalivahan, 2002; Das et al, 2019; Haldar, Kumar, Kumar, Ray, & Srinagesh, 2018; Kaila et al, 1992; Kayal et al, 2011; Kumar et al, 2016; Mandal, 2017, 2019; Mandal et al, 2021; Mandal & Biswas, 2016; Singh et al, 2015; Singh et al, 2021; Vasanthi et al, 2021). Mandal (2017) reported a mean Moho depth of 42 ± 4 km in the SC and 42 ± 1 km in the CGGC based on receiver function analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%