2016
DOI: 10.1139/cjes-2016-0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal accretion of thick mafic crust in Iceland: implications for volcanic rifted margins

Abstract: Rifting near hotspots results in mantle melting to create thick mafic igneous crust at volcanic rifted margins (VRMs). This mafic crust is transitional between rifted continental crust with mafic intrusions landward and oceanic crust into which it grades seaward. Seismic velocities, crustal drilling, and exhumed margins show that the upper crust in these areas is composed of basaltic lava erupted in subaerial to submarine conditions intruded by downward increasing proportions of dikes and sparse gabbroic intru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, structures in Iceland may provide information on finer‐scale details of crustal structure that are difficult or impossible to map on the seafloor. Rift propagation has also been proposed for continental rifts, especially magmatic rifts (e.g., Courtillot, ; Ebinger et al, ; Vink, ), and similar patterns of fault kinematics might be expected in the flanks of these types of rifts (Karson, ). The structures we report may only be visible in Iceland because of glaciation and erosion that have exposed somewhat deeper crustal levels than in other settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, structures in Iceland may provide information on finer‐scale details of crustal structure that are difficult or impossible to map on the seafloor. Rift propagation has also been proposed for continental rifts, especially magmatic rifts (e.g., Courtillot, ; Ebinger et al, ; Vink, ), and similar patterns of fault kinematics might be expected in the flanks of these types of rifts (Karson, ). The structures we report may only be visible in Iceland because of glaciation and erosion that have exposed somewhat deeper crustal levels than in other settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal structure (Fl ovenz & Saemundsson, 1993) and crustal-level magma bodies imaged seismically (Brandsd ottir & Menke, 2008;Einarsson, 1978) and even encountered by drilling (Elders et al, 2011), suggest that the gabbroic middle to lower crust is rheologically weak and may flow laterally along axis during spreading (Jones & Maclennan, 2005). Thus, as in other settings with hot, weak, mafic crust, the mobile lower crust may change thickness substantially relative to that of the rapidly cooled upper crust during spreading (Bell & Buck, 1992;Karson, 2016).…”
Section: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The northern and eastern rift zones extend to the north and south from the hot spot and are linked to the offshore spreading centers by the Tjörnes Fracture Zone and South Iceland Seismic Zone transforms, respectively (Figure ). Both the northern and eastern rift zones are actively propagating away from the hot spot (Karson, ). Rift propagation has resulted in “ridge jumps” to the east, in order for the locus of plate spreading to remain above the hot spot as Iceland migrates west‐northwestward with respect to the hot spot.…”
Section: Spreading In Icelandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rift propagation has resulted in “ridge jumps” to the east, in order for the locus of plate spreading to remain above the hot spot as Iceland migrates west‐northwestward with respect to the hot spot. Spreading on the eastern rift zone is replacing spreading on the western rift zone with which it overlaps (Einarsson, ; Karson, ; LaFemina et al, ). Similarly, spreading on the northern rift zone replaced spreading that occurred on a rift zone to the west in the Skagi area between ~7 and 12 Ma (Hardarson & Fitton, ; Jancin & Young, ; Kristjánsson, et al, ; Kristjánsson & Jónsson, ; Sæmundsson, ; Walters et al, ).…”
Section: Spreading In Icelandmentioning
confidence: 99%