2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1872-5791(08)60063-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal Detachment and Destruction of the Keel of North China Craton: Constraints from Late Mesozoic Extensional Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for development of the surprisingly homogeneous NW-SE extensional field in eastern Asia remain controversial, but in our and others' opinions (Cope and Graham, 2007;Darby et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2008) have little or nothing to do with the profound and puzzling loss or conversion of subcontinental lithospheric mantle that is well documented in easternmost China (Chen et al, 2003;Gao et al, 2002;Xu, 2001). The pattern of variable lithospheric thickness across eastern Asia from the Dabie Shan to southern Siberia has no obvious spatial relationship to either the belts of Early Cretaceous mcc's or the synchronous extensional basins that lie between them Meng, 2003).…”
Section: Extensionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Reasons for development of the surprisingly homogeneous NW-SE extensional field in eastern Asia remain controversial, but in our and others' opinions (Cope and Graham, 2007;Darby et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2008) have little or nothing to do with the profound and puzzling loss or conversion of subcontinental lithospheric mantle that is well documented in easternmost China (Chen et al, 2003;Gao et al, 2002;Xu, 2001). The pattern of variable lithospheric thickness across eastern Asia from the Dabie Shan to southern Siberia has no obvious spatial relationship to either the belts of Early Cretaceous mcc's or the synchronous extensional basins that lie between them Meng, 2003).…”
Section: Extensionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The extensional structures provide an opportunity to explore the mechanisms of the crustal extension and lithosphere thinning of the NCC. Although there are significant differences between the Liaodong extensional structures, and the extensional structures in the other parts of the NCC [3,4], e.g., the rooting depth of the detachment faults, and the age of faulting, the constitutions, internal structures, attitudes, kinematics and dynamics of the structures are highly consistent with each other.…”
Section: The Extensional Structural Associations and Regional Tectonimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They provide an opportunity to the understanding of the mechanisms of crustal extension and lithosphere thinning of the NCC in Early Cretaceous. Many aspects of the extensional structures, e.g., the constitutions, structures, and kinematics etc., in the Liaodong Peninsula are identical to those of the extensional structures from the other parts of the NCC [3,4]. It is therefore reasonable to consider the Liaodong Peninsula as a representative of the NCC, with respect to the shallow structural deformation during the destruction of the craton and thinning of its lithosphere in late Mesozoic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the NCC, MCCs predominate over the other two types of extensional structures. Meanwhile, the detachment faults responsible for the formation of the extensional structures were formed in the range from 140 to 90 Ma with a peak age of formation between 130 and 110 Ma [11,22,23,25]. From the distribution of various extensional structures developed in dif- …”
Section: Regional Tectonic Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their footwalls, however, move almost in the same direction (i.e., WNW-ESE), with an average orientation of stretching lineation between SE130° and NW310°, implying that the extensional structures are formed in an identical stress field. Their formation age spans from 140 to 90 Ma, with the peak age ranging from 130 to 110 Ma [11,22,23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%