2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl008532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates?

Abstract: Abstract. GPS data indicate 30-40 mm yr -I present-day crustalshortening across the Andes, whereas geological evidence shows crustal shortening concentrated in the sub-Andean thrust belt at a much lower rate (<15 mm yr-l). We reconcile the discrepancy between the geodetic and the geological crustal shortening using geodynamic modeling that includes timescale-dependent crustal deformation. The GPS velocities reflect the instantaneous deformation in the Andes that includes both permanent deformation and elastic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because these age estimates play pivotal roles in the calculation of long-term rates of geologic shortening, all existing comparisons to short-term geodetic velocities in the central Andes [e.g., Norabuena et al, 1998;Horton, 1999;Liu et al, 2000;Lamb, 2000;Bevis et al, 2001;Hindle et al, 2002;Khazaradze and Klotz, 2003] must be regarded with extreme caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because these age estimates play pivotal roles in the calculation of long-term rates of geologic shortening, all existing comparisons to short-term geodetic velocities in the central Andes [e.g., Norabuena et al, 1998;Horton, 1999;Liu et al, 2000;Lamb, 2000;Bevis et al, 2001;Hindle et al, 2002;Khazaradze and Klotz, 2003] must be regarded with extreme caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations of retroarc deformation, crustal thickening, plateau uplift, and foreland basin generation have emphasized the importance of horizontal shortening in driving Andean orogenesis [Isacks, 1988;Roeder, 1988;Sheffels, 1990;Schmitz, 1994;Wigger et al, 1994;Beck et al, 1996;Allmendinger et al, 1997;Lamb and Hoke, 1997]. Recently, GPS studies have provided an opportunity to compare modern displacements to geologic rates of shortening [Norabuena et al, 1998;Horton, 1999;Liu et al, 2000;Lamb, 2000;Bevis et al, 2001;Hindle et al, 2002;Khazaradze and Klotz, 2003]. These comparisons, however, arrive at conflicting conclusions about whether shortening rates have increased, decreased, or remained steady during Cenozoic deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A screening of the convergence/shortening ratio could therefore be an indirect way to infer the upper plate viscosity in the different orogens. For example, in the central Andes, the convergence is 73 mm/yr, whereas the shortening is about 40 mm/yr (Liu et al, 2000). Consequently, the convergence/shortening (C/S) ratio is about 1.8, and the subduction rate should be 33 mm/yr.…”
Section: Convergence Versus Shortening and Subduction Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, elastic constitutive equations are usually used to study the short-term deformation of the crust or lithosphere [32,33]. In plate interiors, deep faults always play an important role during the lithospheric deformation [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the overall movement of blocks and its peripheral faults should be treated differently in the numerical study. GPS observation is one of the most direct reflection for the short-term tectonic active [33]. It can be used as the boundary conditions in our numerical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%