2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure and deformation under the Longmenshan and its surroundings revealed by receiver function data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(118 reference statements)
6
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, the δ t measured using the P m s phase is mainly from the mid‐lower crust. Crustal V p / V s studies (Chen et al, ; Sun et al, , ; C. ‐Y. Wang et al, ) revealed that this area is dominated by higher than average V p / V s values, and magnetotelluric observations (e.g., Bai et al, ) showed a high electrical conductivity at lower crust depth beneath this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed above, the δ t measured using the P m s phase is mainly from the mid‐lower crust. Crustal V p / V s studies (Chen et al, ; Sun et al, , ; C. ‐Y. Wang et al, ) revealed that this area is dominated by higher than average V p / V s values, and magnetotelluric observations (e.g., Bai et al, ) showed a high electrical conductivity at lower crust depth beneath this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Relative to the other segments of the LMS fault zone, the northern segment has low V p / V s values (ranging from 1.68 to 1.74; Sun et al, ), suggesting the absence of crustal flow. The consistency between the ϕ measurements and the direction of the maximum horizontal compression (Figure ), which is fault‐orthogonal, suggests that NW‐SE oriented extensional cracks are mostly responsible for the observed anisotropy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observation target in our method is the azimuthal amplitude variation of the conversions and not the splitting signal. Even for the synthetic cases here with a large anisotropic layer thickness of 15 km with a relatively strong coherent anisotropy of 13%, the splitting of the bottomside conversion is 0.5 s. In realistic cases with thinner layers of crustal anisotropy (e.g., shear zones), the splitting will be significantly less, and observational evidence places most around a maximum of ~0.3 s, although crustal splitting values up to ~1 s have been proposed for the thick crust of Tibet [ Sun et al ., ; Niu et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%