2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2016.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure beneath northeast India inferred from receiver function modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moho depth is observed between ∼30 and 32 km beneath the MH. Borah et al (2016) obtained crustal thickness of 32-36 km north of SM based on the S-wave velocity model. The occurrence of thinned crust (30-32 km) beneath SM is also reported by Mitra et al (2018) and Priestley et al (2019).…”
Section: Shear Wave Velocity Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moho depth is observed between ∼30 and 32 km beneath the MH. Borah et al (2016) obtained crustal thickness of 32-36 km north of SM based on the S-wave velocity model. The occurrence of thinned crust (30-32 km) beneath SM is also reported by Mitra et al (2018) and Priestley et al (2019).…”
Section: Shear Wave Velocity Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average elevation of the Shillong Plateau is ∼1 km and is associated with positive gravity anomaly (Verma & Mukhopadhyay, 1977), indicating the lack of a significant crustal root. Receiver function studies (Bora et al, 2014;Borah et al, 2016;Mitra et al, 2005;Ramesh et al, 2005) have confirmed that the crust beneath the Shillong Plateau is indeed the thinnest in NE India and increases both to the north and south of the plateau. These suggest a model of tectonic support of the plateau in the form of crustal scale bounding reverse faults, namely the north dipping Dawki Fault to the south and the blind south dipping Oldham Fault to the north (Bilham & England, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To the east, the plateau is separated from the Mikir Hills by the buried dextral strike-slip Kopili Fault Zone (KFZ) (Vernant et al, 2014), which has hosted a number of recent moderate earthquakes (Kumar et al, 2015). Receiver function studies (Bora et al, 2014;Borah et al, 2016;Mitra et al, 2005;Ramesh et al, 2005) have confirmed that the crust beneath the Shillong Plateau is indeed the thinnest in NE India and increases both to the north and south of the plateau. Receiver function studies (Bora et al, 2014;Borah et al, 2016;Mitra et al, 2005;Ramesh et al, 2005) have confirmed that the crust beneath the Shillong Plateau is indeed the thinnest in NE India and increases both to the north and south of the plateau.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires well‐constrained velocity structure to enable precise location of earthquakes, computation of earthquake source properties to characterize the source zones, and estimation of seismic wave attenuation from the source to any point on the surface of the Earth. The first two have been extensively studied for northeast India, over the past decade (Bora et al, ; Borah et al, ; Kumar et al, ; Mitra et al, ; Mitra et al, ; Ramesh et al, ), but gaps exist in our knowledge of the attenuation structure. The present study focuses on estimation of seismic wave attenuation at a range of frequencies to ascertain the quality factor ( Q ) and its frequency dependence ( η ) for the crust beneath northeast India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%