40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-3390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryogenic Composite Tank Design for Next Generation Launch Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several stress analyses for cryogenic fuel tank design have been performed [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Glaessgen et al presented the initial ply level thermal and mechanical stress analyses to determine the causes of the X-33 liquid-hydrogen tank failure [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several stress analyses for cryogenic fuel tank design have been performed [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Glaessgen et al presented the initial ply level thermal and mechanical stress analyses to determine the causes of the X-33 liquid-hydrogen tank failure [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies on the design of composite pressure vessels subjected to internal and external pressure have been conducted at room temperature [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Several stress analyses for cryogenic fuel tank design have been performed [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Glaessgen et al presented the initial ply level thermal and mechanical stress analyses to determine the causes of the X-33 liquid-hydrogen tank failure [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glaessgen et al presented the initial ply level thermal and mechanical stress analyses to determine the causes of the X-33 liquid-hydrogen tank failure [14]. Abumeri et al performed a finite element stress analysis of IM7/977-2 laminate at À2538C (À4238F) temperature, 207 kPa (30 psi) internal fuel pressure, and 2.5-3 g launch inertia force [15]. However, a detailed computational algorithm was not given in either paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most probable cause of the failure was determined to be a combination of the following phenomena [1,[12][13][14]:…”
Section: X-33 Composite Lh2 Cryotankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further tests were performed to fill, apply internal and external loads, and drain the tank repeatedly 40 times, in order to study its structural integrity under cryogenic temperatures and its reusability [14][15][16].…”
Section: Space Launch Initiative (Sli) Composite Cryotank Programmentioning
confidence: 99%