“…Thus, it is important to assess the characteristics of shale wettability for unconventional energy resources for successful exploitation and development. , Thus, assessing the wettability characteristics is important as it mainly affects the rock and fracturing fluids, which are treatment fluids following unconventional fracturing operations for reservoir development . Essentially, the shale formation is composed of a combination of various mineral constituents (e.g., clay, quartz, calcite, feldspars, and iron oxides) and organic compounds which are found in varying quantities within heterogeneous shale rocks. − However, the wettability of the shale formation is very complex to understand, which in turn displays the different wetting tendencies from hydrophobic to hydrophilic and to mixed wettability. − In the literature, some published studies reported that the shales possess a hydrophilic behavior; − on the contrary, other studies have claimed that they are hydrophobic, ,, and some of them provided that they exhibit mixed wettability. , The reason for such differences in the wettability of shale rocks is the discrepancies in mineralogical composition and textural parameters, complex pore distributions, ,, and the presence of organic matter in varying quantities. ,, Usually, the wettability of conventional reservoirs is obtained by any of the methods mentioned, such as (i) the contact angle (CA) method, (ii) the drainage and imbibition method, (iii) atomic force microscopy (AFM), and (iv) nuclear magnetic resonance and zeta potential. ,− However, the shale formation is extremely tight, exhibiting magnitude of orders lower permeability than the conventional reservoirs; thus, most of the pores are of micro- to nanometer sizes. Hence, in these ultra-low-permeability formations, most of the above-mentioned methods of wettability quantification are inconvenient except the CA method, which is more suitable.…”