Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Cryogenic Engineering Conference/International Cryogenic Materials Conference 1997
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008042688-4/50021-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryogenic operation and testing of the extended LHC Prototype Magnet String

Abstract: After the assembly, commissioning and successful first operation of a full-scale superconducting magnet string, and as a new prototype dipole magnet was added to approach final configuration, the cryogenic system has been slightly modified to allow the verification of the performance of the superfluid helium cooling loop in counter-current two-phase flow. At the same time the control system strategies have been updated and only two quench relief valves have been installed, one at each end of the string. We rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Superconducting magnet cold masses are housed in horizontal cryostats [2] with several layers of heat interception and screening. Prototype full-scale models [3] have been built, tested and assembled into a test String [4,5] in order to validate nominal and accidental operational modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superconducting magnet cold masses are housed in horizontal cryostats [2] with several layers of heat interception and screening. Prototype full-scale models [3] have been built, tested and assembled into a test String [4,5] in order to validate nominal and accidental operational modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining circuits are used for cool-down, 1.9 K temperature control, and cryostat heat intercepts. The string cryogenic system is described in detail in references 3,4 . Prior to their mounting in the string, each magnet has been quench-tested separately in standalone configuration 5 .…”
Section: The Prototype Magnet Stringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each cool-down lasted 3 to 5 days depending on the limitations imposed on temperature gradients across individual magnets. Following a quench, automatic procedures took 6 to 12 hours to cool-down the magnets from approximately 30 K [3,4]. The temperature of the magnets was controlled by a Joule-Thomson valve with very stringent operational constraints (0.025 K control band) imposed by the superconducting magnets characteristics, the capacity of the cryogenic system, the variability of heat loads and the accuracy of instrumentation (± 0.01 K).…”
Section: String Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%