2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopréservation des embryons humains par vitrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the introduction of IVF as a successful clinical treatment for tubal factor infertility over three decades ago (Steptoe and Edwards, 1978), certain changes in the IVF laboratory can be considered landmark events because they markedly improved outcome: (i) preimplantation genetic diagnosis to eliminate oocytes and embryos that are aneuploid or carry pathogenic mutations (Handyside et al, 1990); (ii) ICSI for severe male factor infertility (Palermo et al, 1992); and (iii) cryopreservation (Trounson and Mohr,1983), including the recent and wide-spread adoption of the simpler vitrification method for oocytes and preimplantation-stage embryos (Kuwayama et al, 2005;Vanderzwalmen et al, 2006). In contrast, the basic procedures used for conventional IVF, and for embryo culture regardless of the means of insemination, have changed little from those used to produce the first IVF baby (Steptoe and Edwards, 1978) which, it is worth noting, even then used methods derived from earlier studies in experimental systems (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of IVF as a successful clinical treatment for tubal factor infertility over three decades ago (Steptoe and Edwards, 1978), certain changes in the IVF laboratory can be considered landmark events because they markedly improved outcome: (i) preimplantation genetic diagnosis to eliminate oocytes and embryos that are aneuploid or carry pathogenic mutations (Handyside et al, 1990); (ii) ICSI for severe male factor infertility (Palermo et al, 1992); and (iii) cryopreservation (Trounson and Mohr,1983), including the recent and wide-spread adoption of the simpler vitrification method for oocytes and preimplantation-stage embryos (Kuwayama et al, 2005;Vanderzwalmen et al, 2006). In contrast, the basic procedures used for conventional IVF, and for embryo culture regardless of the means of insemination, have changed little from those used to produce the first IVF baby (Steptoe and Edwards, 1978) which, it is worth noting, even then used methods derived from earlier studies in experimental systems (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of freezing and thawing may have an adverse effect on the blastocyst. The introduction of the vitrification method 16 allows to avoid intracellular ice-crystal formation compared with slow controlled freezing. Still, little ice formation may occur due to the large fluid-filled cavity in the expanded blastocysts that inhibits sufficient permeation of cryoprotectants inside the blastocoel.…”
Section: The Artificial Collapse Of the Blastocystmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans cette optique, des supports de contention « ouverts » (Cryotop, Cryoloop, Hemi-straw, Cryoleaf) sont privilé gié s [1]. Ils permettent d'atteindre des vitesses de refroidissement de plus de 20,000 8C/min.…”
Section: Vitrification En Support De Contention « Ouvert »unclassified