“…Since the introduction of IVF as a successful clinical treatment for tubal factor infertility over three decades ago (Steptoe and Edwards, 1978), certain changes in the IVF laboratory can be considered landmark events because they markedly improved outcome: (i) preimplantation genetic diagnosis to eliminate oocytes and embryos that are aneuploid or carry pathogenic mutations (Handyside et al, 1990); (ii) ICSI for severe male factor infertility (Palermo et al, 1992); and (iii) cryopreservation (Trounson and Mohr,1983), including the recent and wide-spread adoption of the simpler vitrification method for oocytes and preimplantation-stage embryos (Kuwayama et al, 2005;Vanderzwalmen et al, 2006). In contrast, the basic procedures used for conventional IVF, and for embryo culture regardless of the means of insemination, have changed little from those used to produce the first IVF baby (Steptoe and Edwards, 1978) which, it is worth noting, even then used methods derived from earlier studies in experimental systems (e.g.…”